March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: TransactionTimeoutConfiguration pluggability

by jhalliday

> I'm sorry, you're transaction log is corrupt, have a nice day. ;-)" I'm going to get that printed on a t-shirt :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137853#4137853 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137853

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: TransactionTimeoutConfiguration pluggability

by jhalliday

Quite. Rather begs the question, why does getTransactionTimeout throw it for any error? How about the case where there is no default timeout set? Is that an error and if not, what's the expected return value. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137851#4137851 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137851

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: TransactionTimeoutConfiguration pluggability

by adrian＠jboss.org

SystemException is more for messages like "I'm sorry, you're transaction log is corrupt, have a nice day. ;-)" View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137849#4137849 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137849

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: What replaces GenericBeanFactoryMetaData?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

ok, I added a reference to org.jboss.beans.metadata.spi.factory.GenericBeanFactoryMetaData as the replacement in the javadoc. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137847#4137847 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137847

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: TransactionTimeoutConfiguration pluggability

by adrian＠jboss.org

My turn to quote javadoc :-) "The SystemException is thrown by the transaction manager to indicate that it has encountered an unexpected error condition that prevents future transaction services from proceeding." Not really appropriate for a transient failure wrapped in an SQLExecption because the tx has timed out or there's been a setRollbackOnly() due to an application throwing a RuntimeException. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137846#4137846 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137846

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: What replaces GenericBeanFactoryMetaData?

by adrian＠jboss.org

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : There are numerous subclasses of this due to the AspectManagerAwareBeanMetaDataFactory subclass in the aop-mc-int project. | Those are going away once Kabir has the new "improved" versions. The aop classes you are referring to are my prototypes from a couple of years ago. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137845#4137845 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137845

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: TransactionTimeoutConfiguration pluggability

by jhalliday

> SystemException is for serious failure isn't it? Like being unable to determine the current timeout? :-) int getTransactionTimeout() throws SystemException; I picked SystemException to keep the API consistent, but I guess we could ignore that, or change getTransactionTimeout to throw IllegalStateException too. Speaking of consistency, why does getTransactionTimeout() return int whilst getTimeLeftBeforeTransactionTimeout returns long? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137844#4137844 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137844

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: What replaces GenericBeanFactoryMetaData?

by adrian＠jboss.org

It's replaced by a class of the same name in the spi rather than the plugins. Different api as well, "easier to use". View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137843#4137843 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137843

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Shared Parent POM for dependencyManagement

by adrian＠jboss.org

"ALRubinger" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : No we should use constraints (version ranges). But we need to understand how that interacts with the release process and reproducability of tagged versions. | | Brian had this to say about current support for ranges: | | "#maven" wrote : ALR: Brian: Don't know if you're interested, we've been running into some conflicts regarding versioning and transitive dependencies in JBossAS build. | | Brian: ugh | | ALR: Some use cases are documented: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=131748 | | Brian: FWIW, i never used ranges in my corp builds | | ALR: Brian: Is that a vote for "don't Mavenize"? :) | | Brian: no, just don't use ranges | | S, | ALR Is that confirmation that it doesn't understand 1.0.1 > 1.0.0 like I said above. Or is that just his preference. There's no way we can fix dependencies at single version given the number of projects/releases we have. It reminds me of when I started working on the JBossAS source code using eclipse and wondered why it was so slow. It had never been considered that the tool should scale to such a large project. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137842#4137842 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137842

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - What replaces GenericBeanFactoryMetaData?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

GenericBeanFactoryMetaData is deprecated, but I don't see what replaces it. There are numerous subclasses of this due to the AspectManagerAwareBeanMetaDataFactory subclass in the aop-mc-int project. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137841#4137841 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4137841

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008