Did you look in the new component-matrix module's pom.xml? That has 2.2.4.GA. The module doesn't show up in eclipse as it has no .project or .classpath, but it's there.
I made changes there for local testing and ran the build and the new versions appeared in thirdparty. No idea how. :-) I didn't do any mvn install or mvn deploy after changing the component-matrix/pom.xml; just treated the pom as a new flavor of build-thirdparty.xml -- change it, ran build/build.sh and it worked.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141930#4141930
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141930
So I take it the dependency versions are still coming from jboss-as-component-matrix? However, when I do a build I see thirdparty/jboss/common-core/component-info.xml refer to version 2.2.4.GA while the jboss-as-component-matrix-5.0.0-SNAPSHOT.pom has 2.2.3.GA. I can't figure out what is driving the to the 2.2.4.GA version. This is what is in the build/build-thirdparty.xml, but when I update that to 2.2.5.beta1, the thirdparty contents are stil at 2.2.4.GA.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141924#4141924
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141924
This is fixed but needs a new jboss-common-core 2.2.5.GA release. Note that the correct system property to use is the jboss.server.home.dir. No .url properties can be used as this ends up nesting a file: protocol inside of the vfsfile:
| <bean name="StandardLoginConfig" class="org.jboss.security.auth.login.DynamicLoginConfig">
| <property name="policyConfig">
| <jbsx:policy
| xsi:schemaLocation="urn:jboss:security-config:5.0 vfsfile:${jboss.server.home.dir}/lib/jboss-metadata.jar/schema/security-config_5_0.xsd"
| xmlns:jbsx="urn:jboss:security-config:5.0"
| xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
|
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141874#4141874
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141874