April 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Dependency conflicts lost during AS mavenization

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Could you explain what's going on to me? I simply added the new spi to the repo... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140799#4140799 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140799

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Dependency conflicts lost during AS mavenization

by wolfc

Another caveat: [carlo@nymph interceptors]$ mvn dependency:tree | [INFO] Scanning for projects... | [INFO] Searching repository for plugin with prefix: 'dependency'. | WAGON_VERSION: 1.0-beta-2 | [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | [INFO] Building JBoss EJB 3.0 Interceptors | [INFO] task-segment: [dependency:tree] | [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Downloading: http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/jbossws-spi/1.0.2.GA/jbossws... | Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jboss/jbossws-spi/1.0.2.GA/jbossws-spi-... | Downloading: http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/jbossws-spi/1.0.2.GA/jbossws... | Downloading: http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/jbossws-spi/1.0.2.GA/jbossws... | Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jboss/jbossws-spi/1.0.2.GA/jbossws-spi-... | [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | [ERROR] BUILD ERROR | [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. | | Missing: | ---------- | 1) org.jboss:jbossws-spi:jar:1.0.2.GA | | Try downloading the file manually from the project website. | | Then, install it using the command: | mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.jboss -DartifactId=jbossws-spi -Dversion=1.0.2.GA -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file | | Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there: | mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.jboss -DartifactId=jbossws-spi -Dversion=1.0.2.GA -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id] | | Path to dependency: | 1) org.jboss.ejb3:jboss-ejb3-interceptors:jar:0.12.0-SNAPSHOT | 2) org.jboss:jboss-metadata:jar:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT | 3) org.jboss:jbossws-spi:jar:1.0.2.GA | | ---------- | 1 required artifact is missing. | | for artifact: | org.jboss.ejb3:jboss-ejb3-interceptors:jar:0.12.0-SNAPSHOT | | from the specified remote repositories: | central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2), | jboss-snapshots (http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2), | repository.jboss.com (http://repository.jboss.org/maven2) | | | [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch | [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | [INFO] Total time: 3 seconds | [INFO] Finished at: Wed Apr 02 09:10:05 CEST 2008 | [INFO] Final Memory: 8M/102M | [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r4111 | heiko.braun(a)jboss.com | 2008-04-02 09:08:49 +0200 (Wed, 02 Apr 2008) | 1 | line | | jbossws spi 1.0.2 artifacts added A snapshot artificat (jboss-metadata) arrives at the final repository before a released artifact (jbossws-spi). I'm going to need strong coffee today. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140796#4140796 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140796

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Dependency conflicts lost during AS mavenization

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

I am going to remove the remaining spi artifacts from the repository. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140794#4140794 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140794

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: webservices ejb3 api usage

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

yep, it's there View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140792#4140792 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140792

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Dependency conflicts lost during AS mavenization

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

OK, we stick to this name: | org.jboss:jbossws-spi:jar: | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140791#4140791 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140791

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Circular dependency error msg problem

by ALRubinger

I'm seeing: 23:04:15,155 WARN [HDScanner] Failed to process changes | org.jboss.deployers.client.spi.IncompleteDeploymentException: Summary of incomplete deployments (SEE PREVIOUS ERRORS FOR DETAILS): | .... | >From hard copy deployment, but JMX Deployments are silent and do not report errors. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140790#4140790 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140790

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Sending SOAP Message through HttpListener rather than JM

by coejboss

Can it be a version issue of jboss-remoting.jar? I am using Specification-Version: 2.2.1.GA. Waiting for response. Regards CoE-JBoss View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140784#4140784 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140784

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Jdbc Cahce Loader Issue

by shanthi_jbosscache

Hi, I am using Jboss cache in webapplication which is deployed in weblogic clustered environment. I have two management ports.I am using JDBC Cache Loader and cache is clustered across the weblogic portals. I started the portal1 server succeessfully and cache also started.In the db table whatever i have put in the cache , all the records are in the DB also.When I start the Portal2 server,I tried to stop the server by killing the process. Now the DB contains very less records. I think StoreEntireState method is called by Cacheloader and it is replace the records in the db with the data which was loaded in the cache during startup of portal2 server. is it true? plese help... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140777#4140777 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140777

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JBoss 2.0 Thread model

by trustin

We also need to think from the MINA transport standpoint. MINA could provie a meta-transport which maps arbitrary number of connections into arbitrary number of sessions. Of course, there should be underlying protocol implementation that manages the mapping, but I think it's trivial. Once such a transport is provided, both Remoting and Messaging could simplify their implementation. WDYT? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140774#4140774 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140774

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - U Prove, sso holy grail?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

>From http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2008/04/microsoft, never heard of it, can't seem to find much about it. anonymous wrote : | In a move that could extend its already substantial presence in the realm of identity access and management, the software giant recently announced it had acquired the patents to the U-Prove technology developed by cryptographer Stefan Brands and his colleagues at the Montreal startup, Credentica. | | Implemented properly, the U-Prove algorithms could allow users to exercise absolute control over the information they release online; guarantee that whatever information they did release would not linger indefinitely; and make it impossible to hack, link or trace that information back to them. | | Unlike other privacy solutions, including Microsoft's current CardSpace system, U-Prove guarantees a user's privacy even in the face of collusion by identity providers and relying parties -- the very organizations that certify our online identities and require us to prove them. | | "It allows single sign-on, without every site you sign onto being able to link your account with every other site you sign onto," British privacy guru Ben Laurie writes in an e-mail interview. | | Many privacy experts see the acquisition as a shrewd move by the company, and a good thing for online privacy in general. Yet some have also voiced concern that Microsoft might lock Brands' algorithms into what Laurie calls a "proprietary Microsoft-technology silo." | | Both Brands and Kim Cameron, Microsoft's chief identity architect, are trying to assuage those fears. | | According to Cameron, the company wants to ensure interoperability between Microsoft and non-Microsoft privacy platforms, and has no intention of hoarding U-Prove. Cameron intends to integrate Brands' algorithms into Microsoft's existing identity-access-and-management platform by mid-2009, and plans to open the application programming interface to the world. | | Moreover, Brands says Microsoft is placing the technology under its Open Specification Promise, which amounts to a pledge not to sue anyone for patent infringement unless someone tries to sue Microsoft first. The intention, he says, is "to make it possible for anyone to use this technology whether they use Windows or not." | | ... | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140768#4140768 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140768

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2008