May 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - Start contributing

by leonidMir

Hi all, I want to start contributing to JBOSS application server and decided QA is the best place to start from. Can you please direct me? Where to start? Some known tasks that it is good for me to start with ? BTW I am already familiar a little bit with the product. Thx :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149983#4149983 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149983

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Potential enhancement to jbpm

by kukeltje

the second thing I hate most (besides AV-pair solutions) is having 2 different solutions for the same problem... twice the amount of documentation, twice the amount of errors, twice the amount of questions, twice.... DRY... I'll have my first look at the jdpl parsing for 4.0 (if there already is something in cvs) and see what can be done. The only thing *I* need is access to the stored xml in whatever form. The api will be very simple and very dom/xpath like... clean and simple just need the xsd to allow any content with *other* namespaces below any element View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149967#4149967 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149967

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Potential enhancement to jbpm

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"kukeltje" wrote : anonymous wrote : the annotations are only a way to make it extensible. | No, I disagree. I implemented (a long time ago) some code in jbpm (my local branch) that you could use to extend process files with your own tags, just in a different NAMESPACE (I know you hate those, but I hate attribute value solutions MUCH MORE ;-)). Remarks like: namespaces are difficult are rubbish. I could draw up some small examples that anybody could understand (even my manager did) but the decision is up to the you guys.... I'll concede with whatever comes out... properties and namespaces don't exclude each other. in fact, i don't have anything against namespaces. i just want that it is also possible without. since i don't have the time to work out the solution with and without namespaces, i opt to build the solutions without namespaces first. if someone would contribute proper namespace handling (so that it still works without), that would be great. only if a decent test suite is worked out, this can be maintained. for a start, i know that the dom parser that we have in pvm supports namespaces. so go for it :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149938#4149938 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149938

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: A few problems running the examples on different machine

by timfox

I just did the following: ant clean ant distro cd build/messaging-2.0.0.alpha1/docs/examples/jms/etc vi jndi.properties [changed ip address of server to 192.168.0.51 - my server] cd .. ant queueExample and I get: | queueExample: | [java] javax.naming.CommunicationException [Root exception is java.rmi.ConnectException: Connection refused to host: 127.0.0.1; nested exception is: | [java] java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused] | [java] at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:782) | [java] at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:629) | [java] at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:351) | [java] at org.jboss.jms.example.QueueExample.main(QueueExample.java:47) | [java] Caused by: java.rmi.ConnectException: Connection refused to host: 127.0.0.1; nested exception is: | [java] java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused | [java] at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPEndpoint.newSocket(TCPEndpoint.java:574) | [java] at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.createConnection(TCPChannel.java:185) | [java] at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.newConnection(TCPChannel.java:171) | [java] at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:94) | [java] at java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invokeRemoteMethod(RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.java:179) | [java] at java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.java:132) | [java] at $Proxy0.lookup(Unknown Source) | [java] at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:669) | [java] ... 3 more | [java] Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused | [java] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method) | [java] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:333) | [java] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(PlainSocketImpl.java:195) | [java] at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:182) | [java] at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:366) | [java] at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:520) | [java] at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:470) | [java] at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:367) | [java] at java.net.Socket.<init>(Socket.java:180) | [java] at sun.rmi.transport.proxy.RMIDirectSocketFactory.createSocket(RMIDirectSocketFactory.java:22) | [java] at sun.rmi.transport.proxy.RMIMasterSocketFactory.createSocket(RMIMasterSocketFactory.java:128) | [java] at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPEndpoint.newSocket(TCPEnd | Any ideas what I am doing wrong. The core client test SimpleClient works ok as long as I manually change the hardcoded server address in the Location object View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149914#4149914 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149914

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: A few problems running the examples on different machine

by ataylor

there is a jndi.properties under docs/examples/jms/etc which gets picked up. Ive just tested it and it seems to work fine View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149912#4149912 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149912

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: How to decide whether to persisitent a process into data

by kukeltje

wrong forum and *please* no duplicate posts View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149908#4149908 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149908

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - A few problems running the examples on different machines

by timfox

I thought I'd try and run the examples with server and client on different machines but ran into a few issues. Whatever I tried the JMS examples always tried to lookup the name server on localhost, which clearly failed. I had to hack the example and hardcode a jndi server host to get it to work. For the core examples, the server name, port etc, is also hardcoded, so I had to hack this too. Any server hosts, ports etc should be in a local build.properties or jndi.properties so they can be changed by the user. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149904#4149904 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149904

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Update to jboss-metadata 1.0.0.Beta15

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Its done. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149870#4149870 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149870

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Update to jboss-metadata 1.0.0.Beta15

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I'm going to be updating jbossas and ejb3-ext-api-* to jboss-metadata 1.0.0.Beta15 for the latest change in the determineResolvedJndiName and DefaultJndiBindingPolicy shortly. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149868#4149868 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149868

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Combined codec and packet

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"timfox" wrote : "trustin" wrote : | | Hmm, or MINA could provide a concurrent hash map backed implementation out of the box (although it will not be the default). | | | | I like the idea of MINA having some config switch boolean "useConcurrentSessionMap" which if true uses a ConcurrentHashMap and if false uses the synchronized map. Then the user can choose which to use based on their number of expected connections and available RAM. This can default to false to preserve current behaviour. +1 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149836#4149836 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149836

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2008