June 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Regarding JBoss ESB

by mvecera＠redhat.com

Regarding calling ESB services, there is class ServiceInvoker which does that. Try to find it in source code or documentation to see how it is used, but in general it is as follows: Message esbMessage = MessageFactory.getInstance().getMessage(); | Call call = new Call(); | call.setMessageID(new URI(UUID.randomUUID().toString())); | esbMessage.getHeader().setCall(call); | esbMessage.getBody().add(text); | new ServiceInvoker(category, name).deliverAsync(esbMessage); View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160542#4160542 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160542

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: VFS HDScanner test

by mstruk

Correct. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160539#4160539 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160539

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - ForceClear tests are stupid

by adrian＠jboss.org

I've fixed the following test org.jboss.test.mdbsessionpoolclear.test.MDBUnitTestCase so it at least runs to completion. But this test isn't actually testing anything. The ForceClear was described as "experimental" by the person that wrote it. Except that it broke the normal behaviour http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-5428 The idea of the ForceClear option is that if the MDB is busy, the undeployment of the MDB will still proceed after a certain amount of waiting. This test, doesn't test that behaviour. The MDB has no wait at all | public void onMessage(Message message) | { | try | { | InitialContext jndiContext = new InitialContext(); | TestStatusHome statusHome = (TestStatusHome)jndiContext.lookup("TestStatus"); | TestStatus status = statusHome.create(); | int count = status.increment(); | log.info("**** Mdb got message " + count + " " + ((TextMessage)message).getText()); | } | catch (Exception e) | { | e.printStackTrace(); | } | } | So I don't see how it would ever block the undeploy? The undeploy isn't even part of the test, it's in the test setup. So we have an undocumentated feature, that broke the normal behaviour and isn't actually tested. It's a good job the person that did this work doesn't work for Redhat anymore. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160538#4160538 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160538

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss (Clusters/JBoss)] - Re: JBPAPP-863 -- FC blocks during slow failure detection

by dpospisi＠redhat.com

I am not flushing responses and also do not resend requests until I receive response from the client - I am overriding default HttpClient retry policy. But yes, I have configured mod_jk to send retries. This is used worker setup: worker.jawa03.port=8009 worker.jawa03.host=192.168.1.3 worker.jawa03.type=ajp13 worker.jawa03.lbfactor=1 worker.jawa03.socket_timeout=30 worker.jawa03.connect_timeout=5000 worker.jawa03.prepost_timeout=8000 worker.jawa03.retries=2 worker.jawa03.reply_timeout=8000 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160532#4160532 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160532

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - JMXConnector problems in AS5 testsuite

by alesj

Cross-posting (or asking for jboss remoting guys help :-) http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160517#4160517 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160528#4160528 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160528

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - Re: Duplicate jmx remoting in jbossas5

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : Should we include JBoss Remoting guys to help here, since it's their (TElrod's) legacy. | Or is Adrian gonna single-handedly solve this? :-) If the remoting guys aren't going to solve/fix it, I'm happy with just using the old RMIAdapter. Another problem with the JSR160 stuff, is that it has the Serialization problem for values in the MBeanInfo. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160517#4160517 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160517

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: VFS HDScanner test

by alesj

So, if I understand this correct, if we're to 'cache' this line | VirtualFile deployDir = VFS.getRoot(applicationDir.toURI()); | there should be no problem in real PS usage where frequency of new deployments is rare? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160514#4160514 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160514

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - Re: Duplicate jmx remoting in jbossas5

by alesj

Should we include JBoss Remoting guys to help here, since it's their (TElrod's) legacy. Or is Adrian gonna single-handedly solve this? :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160510#4160510 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160510

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: VFS HDScanner test

by alesj

Their correct behavior shouldn't depend on the way they are run. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160507#4160507 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160507

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: VFS HDScanner test

by mstruk

Hmm, I see. Currently there is only one test method in HDScannerTestCase, I run the tests through CLI, and each test is run forked ... It works for all these: | mvn package | mvn test | mvn test -Dtest=HDScannerTestCase | So people run these in ways that they don't get forked? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160504#4160504 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160504

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2008