June 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Missing Stack Specific Resources Maven Artifacts

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

Yes, we forgot on that:( To finalize this forum thread here are the associated issues: JBWS-2228 JBWS-2229 JBWS-2231 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157895#4157895 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157895

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [sim] German article about simulation module available

by jbarrez

Nice work, Bernd. This is something I wanted to do for myself quite some time now. I'll certainly read it this weekend and see if it fits my requirements. Thanx for the contribution! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157893#4157893 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157893

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - jBPM integration with ESB

by camunda

I hope I have some credits in this forum and I dare a cross post ;-) see http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157887 anonymous wrote : Hi! | | I currently wrote an article about that in the German Java Magazin. It is not yet printed (in fact, if you want to review it send me a mail before the weekend, that would be nice :-)) but the example is already available online: http://www.camunda.com/knowledge/jbpm_meets_esb.html. | | As soon as I get the article as PDF I will provide it there... | | But the integration is overall really simple. Cool stuff :-) | Cheers Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157888#4157888 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157888

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [sim] German article about simulation module available

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

thanks ! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157886#4157886 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157886

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - [sim] German article about simulation module available

by camunda

Hi! I just wanted to post the link to two articles in the German Java Magazin about the jbpm simulation framework. They are linked on this side (as PDF): http://www.camunda.com/jbpm_simulation/introduction.html. A presentation (half German, half English) is also available as PDF... Have fun with it Cheers Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157883#4157883 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157883

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: container integration naming issue

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

I don't see it as a problem at least for AS trunk. As you use to say Thomas container integration resides in AS code base. I'm going to sync AS trunk today with jboss501 integration layer, thus there's no maven artifact needed for AS trunk to include our separate jboss integration layer inside. Or did I miss something? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157878#4157878 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157878

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: container integration naming issue

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

It could simply carry the name for the container it was released (QA'd) for: jbossws-jboss-5.0.0.CR1 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157877#4157877 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157877

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - container integration naming issue

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, we currently use jbossws-jboss421-3.0.2-SNAPSHOT jbossws-jboss422-3.0.2-SNAPSHOT jbossws-jboss423-3.0.2-SNAPSHOT jbossws-jboss500-3.0.2-SNAPSHOT jbossws-jboss501-3.0.2-SNAPSHOT This works on the premisses that jboss500 == jboss-5.0.0.Beta4 jboss501 == jboss-5.0.0.CR1 The naming scheme will however fail when CR1 gets released and container integration moves on towards CR2 or GA. It will also fail for jboss-4.2.2.SP1, etc More generally, this naming scheme does not support multiple versions for the same AS minor version. To fix this, we would need to factor the AS version into the naming scheme. Possibly like jbossws-jboss-5.0.0.Beta4-3.0.2-SNAPSHOT jbossws-jboss-5.0.0.CR1-3.0.2-SNAPSHOT This scheme would obviously support a matrix of multiple container versions against multiple jbossws versions, which is required according to http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Supported_Target_Containers The above suggestion however fails, because maven does not support dependencies with multiple versions on the same artifact. Thoughts? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157876#4157876 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157876

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: JBoss Cache Public API

by genman

Filed the optimization issue as JBCACHE-1368 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157870#4157870 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157870

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Creating a Druable Queue in JBoss

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

I assume you're talking about JMS queues. You should post the question on the "JBoss Messaging" forum (http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewforum&f=238 if you want to use the newer and better JBossMessaging implementation of JMS. I see that you also posted the question on the "Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ" forum, which concerns the older JBossMQ implementation. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157863#4157863 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157863

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2008