June 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by alesj

I can commit the test and let you play with it? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157304#4157304 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157304

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by alesj

"alex.loubyansky(a)jboss.com" wrote : Can you try this feature? | http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/features.html#xinclude.fixup-base-uris Nope, having this | <xi:include fixup-base-uris="false" fixup-language="false" href="included.xml"/> | still results in same error as before. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157303#4157303 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157303

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

"alesj" wrote : "alex.loubyansky(a)jboss.com" wrote : That's clearly a step in the right direction. | But I don't like that you have to explicitly add that namespace. | I would assume that xi:include should behave the same way as if you would have that piece of text directly written in the original - where you don't need extra namespace. That's the XML/XSD rules. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157300#4157300 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157300

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

Actually, maybe not an XB issue. There two options: fix the schema to accept xml:base or set the feature on the parser to not "fixup" xml:base. http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/faq-xinclude.html Can you try this feature? http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/features.html#xinclude.fixup-base-uris View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157299#4157299 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157299

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by alesj

"alex.loubyansky(a)jboss.com" wrote : That's clearly a step in the right direction. But I don't like that you have to explicitly add that namespace. I would assume that xi:include should behave the same way as if you would have that piece of text directly written in the original - where you don't need extra namespace. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157298#4157298 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157298

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by alesj

"alex.loubyansky(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Looks like another issue for XB. :-( I hope you haven't done CR10 yet. ;-) Let me know when this will be in jbossxb trunk. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157297#4157297 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157297

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

That's clearly a step in the right direction. I haven't seen the exception before. The attribute should be ignored http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/#syntax Looks like another issue for XB. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157296#4157296 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157296

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by alesj

"alex.loubyansky(a)jboss.com" wrote : Maybe the namespace in the included.xml? Like this? | <jboss-test xmlns="urn:jboss:include:1.0">test2</jboss-test> | Then I get this | Caused by: org.jboss.xb.binding.JBossXBRuntimeException: Attribute is not bound: element owner {urn:jboss:include:1.0}jboss-test, attribute {http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace}base | at org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.AttributesHandler.attributes(AttributesHandler.java:58) | at org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.DefaultElementHandler.attributes(DefaultElementHandler.java:65) | at org.jboss.xb.builder.runtime.BeanHandler.startParticle(BeanHandler.java:124) | at org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.SundayContentHandler.startElement(SundayContentHandler.java:632) | at org.jboss.xb.binding.parser.sax.SaxJBossXBParser$DelegatingContentHandler.startElement(SaxJBossXBParser.java:401) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.startElement(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.xinclude.XIncludeHandler.startElement(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanStartElement(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl$NSContentDispatcher.scanRootElementHook(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher.dispatch(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.xinclude.XIncludeHandler.handleIncludeElement(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.xinclude.XIncludeHandler.emptyElement(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanStartElement(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher.dispatch(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLParser.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source) | at org.jboss.xb.binding.parser.sax.SaxJBossXBParser.parse(SaxJBossXBParser.java:199) | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157279#4157279 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157279

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

Maybe the namespace in the included.xml? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157276#4157276 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157276

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Is META-INF in the classpath?

by alesj

I've now have this: | <jboss-include xmlns="urn:jboss:include:1.0" name="mymetadata" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"> | | <jboss-test>test1</jboss-test> | <xi:include href="included.xml"/> | | </jboss-include> | where included.xml is | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <jboss-test>test2</jboss-test> | If I comment out include in the first xml, I'm fine with parsing. But if I use it, then I get this: | Caused by: org.jboss.xb.binding.JBossXBException: Failed to parse source: jboss-test not found as a child of {urn:jboss:include:1.0}jboss-include | at org.jboss.xb.binding.parser.sax.SaxJBossXBParser.parse(SaxJBossXBParser.java:201) | at org.jboss.xb.binding.UnmarshallerImpl.unmarshal(UnmarshallerImpl.java:181) | at org.jboss.deployers.vfs.spi.deployer.JBossXBDeployerHelper.parse(JBossXBDeployerHelper.java:190) | at org.jboss.deployers.vfs.spi.deployer.JBossXBDeployerHelper.parse(JBossXBDeployerHelper.java:164) | at org.jboss.deployers.vfs.spi.deployer.SchemaResolverDeployer.parse(SchemaResolverDeployer.java:132) | at org.jboss.deployers.vfs.spi.deployer.SchemaResolverDeployer.parse(SchemaResolverDeployer.java:118) | at org.jboss.deployers.vfs.spi.deployer.AbstractVFSParsingDeployer.parse(AbstractVFSParsingDeployer.java:185) | at org.jboss.deployers.spi.deployer.helpers.AbstractParsingDeployerWithOutput.createMetaData(AbstractParsingDeployerWithOutput.java:336) | Where my metadata is: | @JBossXmlSchema(namespace="urn:jboss:include:1.0", elementFormDefault=XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED) | @XmlRootElement(name="jboss-include", namespace = "urn:jboss:include:1.0") | @XmlType( | name="includeType", | namespace="urn:jboss:include:1.0", | propOrder={"others"} | ) | public class IncludeMetaData implements Serializable | { | /** The serialVersionUID */ | private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; | | private String name; | private List<TestMetaData> others; | | public String getName() | { | return name; | } | | @XmlAttribute(required = true) | public void setName(String name) | { | this.name = name; | } | | public List<TestMetaData> getOthers() | { | return others; | } | | @XmlElement(name = "jboss-test") | public void setOthers(List<TestMetaData> others) | { | this.others = others; | } | } | | @JBossXmlSchema(namespace="urn:jboss:mytest:1.0", elementFormDefault=XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED) | @XmlRootElement(name="jboss-test") | public class TestMetaData implements Serializable | { | /** The serialVersionUID */ | private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; | private String name; | | public String getName() | { | return name; | } | | @XmlAttribute(required = true) | public void setName(String name) | { | this.name = name; | } | } | What am I missing? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157274#4157274 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4157274

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2008