July 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Tests for Pass-By-Value Semantics

by ALRubinger

This Thread is to describe a set of desired Unit Tests for EJB3 Proxy; community contributor Robert Marcano has expressed interest in doing some development. https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1401 "EJB 3.0 Core Specification" wrote : The remote client view of an enterprise bean is location independent. A client running in the same JVM as a bean instance uses the same API to access the bean as a client running in a different JVM on the same or different machine. | | The arguments and results of the methods of the remote business interface are passed by value. Regardless of whether a call to an @Remote view is intra-JVM, this states that the arguments/return values must be passed by value. We currently need tests for this case, and these may take a very similar form to the "spec_3_4_5" package in EJB3 Proxy Unit Tests. I'll set up the skeleton for the test execution, and will leave implementation of the tests themselves. Some instructions for Obtaining Sources / Building are: http://wiki.jboss.org/auth/wiki/DevEJB3NewPlugin ...and you may ignore everything regarding "Patching AS", or running the Integration TestSuite. All that's required here is to obtain the EJB3 Project sources and run the Unit Tests from the Proxy module via Maven; no other integration affects this issue. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166827#4166827 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4166827

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Any compilation errors in ejb3-proxy?

by ALRubinger

I've put EJB3 Proxy back into the Aggregator and have resolved the compile errors / Unit Tests. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166826#4166826 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4166826

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: New Remoting Integration Project

by ALRubinger

Spell it out for me? Unclear. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166824#4166824 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4166824

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - need a jboss-cl release

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I need a jboss-cl release for recent changes. Should I move the existing closed issues to a 2.0.0.Beta13? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166823#4166823 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4166823

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Questionable, but working, fix for JBMETA-83

by ALRubinger

I've commented for JBoss Employees the defining CTS case on the JIRA. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166822#4166822 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4166822

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: New Remoting Integration Project

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

So remove those dependencies and inject them if they are really needed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166820#4166820 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4166820

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Questionable, but working, fix for JBMETA-83

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Unlikely that one would chose such a name for a bean. There can only be one in an ear. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166819#4166819 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4166819

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Questionable, but working, fix for JBMETA-83

by ALRubinger

Unlikely that it's happening, or unlikely that a smart person would do it? S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166818#4166818 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4166818

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: New Remoting Integration Project

by ALRubinger

There's an older discussion on this here: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4147407 ...where Carlo says that the dependency is OK. I disagree; if I want to use a remoting aspect in my project I don't want to bring in Security or Tx because a Util class is in the wrong place. :) S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166817#4166817 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4166817

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - New Remoting Integration Project

by ALRubinger

This topic is pulled from a tangential discussion on: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=109907 I'd noted before that we may move the following classes: "ALRubinger" wrote : PojiProxy | Remoting | AOPRemotingInvocationHandler ...from jboss-remoting-aspects into a new Remoting-esque project, where I'd also cited: "ALRubinger" wrote : Only thing we get by moving it out is an organizational benefit. This is incorrect, given https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBASPECT-3. The issue is that jboss-remoting-aspects holds these convenience classes which also create a dependency upon the Tx and Security aspects, violating the orthogonal nature of an aspect-based project. So the question remaining is, where to put the new project? http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/integration/trunk/ - Contains SPIs, so this doesn't seem like a great fit http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/remoting - Seems misleading, this is not the Remoting project itself, but rather some convenience mechanisms to using Remoting alongside jboss-aspects. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166816#4166816 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4166816

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2008