August 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Using AnnotationEnvironment in Seam

by epbernard

with this class hierarchy Person <- Customer <- Employee Employee / Customer and Person are marked as @Entity. I need to know the hierarchy relation between them. Should I load the classes and build the class hierarchy, or should this be a service. I guess it does not matter a lot s I need to load the classes in this case. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4171517#4171517 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4171517

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Looking at deployment structure - JBAS-5823

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

The testsuite started failing in the tests-clustered-profileservice target around the time of these changes: https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-TestSuite-sun15/830/ Are either of you looking at this; if not I can have a look later today. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4171516#4171516 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4171516

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Messages are lost on Queue?

by timfox

So where are they going then? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4171514#4171514 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4171514

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Messages are lost on Queue?

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"timfox" wrote : Maybe the "lost" messages are in the killed consumer which still exists on the server until server side cleanup kicks in. | | This would be correct behaviour. As I said: "Clebert" wrote : It doesn't matter if you wait some time before restart the Listener, you will aways loose messages. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4171513#4171513 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4171513

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1454 Encapsulate Container infomation in TO/VO

by jaikiran

"ALRubinger" wrote : | So try adding accessors for the properties mentioned to InvokableContext, making sure they line up with the actual method names used by EJB3 Core SessionSpecContainers, and then EJB3 core can do a JndiSessionRegistrar.bindEjb(otherParams,this)... | We can introduce these on InvokableContext: Index: D:/JBoss/EJB3/proxy/src/main/java/org/jboss/ejb3/proxy/container/InvokableContext.java | =================================================================== | --- D:/JBoss/EJB3/proxy/src/main/java/org/jboss/ejb3/proxy/container/InvokableContext.java (revision 77145) | +++ D:/JBoss/EJB3/proxy/src/main/java/org/jboss/ejb3/proxy/container/InvokableContext.java (working copy) | @@ -21,9 +21,13 @@ | */ | package org.jboss.ejb3.proxy.container; | | +import javax.naming.InitialContext; | + | +import org.jboss.aop.Advisor; | import org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.Invocation; | import org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.InvocationResponse; | import org.jboss.ejb3.common.lang.SerializableMethod; | +import org.jboss.metadata.ejb.jboss.JBossSessionBeanMetaData; | | + | + /** | + * Returns the initial context | + * @return | + */ | + InitialContext getInitialContext(); | + | + /** | + * Returns the session bean metadata | + * @return | + */ | + JBossSessionBeanMetaData getMetaData(); | + | + /** | + * Returns the classloader associated with this {@link InvokableContext} | + * @return | + */ | + ClassLoader getClassloader(); | + | + /** | + * Returns the name of the container | + * @return | + */ | + String getName(); | + | + /** | + * Returns the global unique id of the container | + * @return | + */ | + String getGuid(); | + | + /** | + * Returns the advisor to use for generated proxies | + * @return | + */ | + Advisor getAdvisor(); | } | Some related questions: 1) The interface InvokableContext sounds generic and probably can be used to carry out any generic invocation. So is it appropriate to introduce getGuid (and similar) method here? What i mean is, do all invocable objects need to have a Guid? 2) The following 2 methods are not available in the EJB3 Core SessionSpecContainers. Introducing these on InvokableContext will require an (straightforward) implementation in the SessionSpecContainers: String getName(); // Currently the EJB3 core, generates a name based on getObjectName().getCanonicalName() | | String getGuid(); // EJB3 Core, currently uses Ejb3Registry.guid(this) to generate this | 3) I see that the getAdvisor method is deprecated on the EJBContainer: | @Deprecated | public Advisor getAdvisor() | { | return beanContainer._getAdvisor(); | } Any specific reason? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4171511#4171511 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4171511

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Using AnnotationEnvironment in Seam

by alesj

"epbernard" wrote : | - Getting intersections of annotated classes too: get all class with @Named and @Startup, could be useful too (not entirely sure but I can see a couple of use cases) | You can do intersections later on, since I don't see how could I make this more efficient, because I always need to go over all classes/annotations - e.g. for other non-Seam users. You can probably then create your own Element, implementing hash and equals, so that Set operations work as they should. "epbernard" wrote : | - Getting a class hierarchy: its often that you need to build a class hierarchy based on a given class, might be useful as a service? I don't understand what exactly you mean here? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4171505#4171505 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4171505

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Looking at deployment structure - JBAS-5823

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : See if you can wire up the rest and get it to work. Done. ;-) The deployers tests are now ported over to Managed API / ProfileService: - http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-cvs-commits/2008-August/070030.html View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4171503#4171503 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4171503

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: is there a web front end for Beta1 version?

by jesper.pedersen

Great, Huijuan :) We have the initial code setup for the web frontend in the SVN repository based on JSF/Facelets/RichFaces. Use "ant web" to build the WAR File. Feel free to post any questions you may have. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4171495#4171495 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4171495

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1423 Test case for @RemoteBinding

by jaikiran

I am done with the testcase. They are passing :) "ALRubinger" wrote : | Some change requests to your patch (mostly housekeeping): | | * Add to setupBeforeClass the boilerplate for deploying *-aop.xml, | example in JndiSessionRegistrarTestCaseBase (else tests will fail) | Done "ALRubinger" wrote : | * Add tests that the explicit addresses are also unbound upon undeploy | Done. "ALRubinger" wrote : | Also, the package name / class name of the test could be more in-line with those you've done for JndiSessionRegistrarTestCaseBase; they both test pretty much the same thing, only difference is that this new one uses explicit bindings as opposed to the default. Maybe they could be merged? | Yes, that's a good point. "ALRubinger" wrote : | I'd just like it to be ultra-clear what these tests do from their names alone (JndiSessionRegistrarTestCaseBase sounds pretty vauge). Open to your suggestions here and then we'll move things around to be friendlier. | How about merging these tests into a JNDIBindingTestCase, since all these tests, check that the ejb objects are properly bound/unbound to/from JNDI? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4171489#4171489 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4171489

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: is there a web front end for Beta1 version?

by Huijuan Shao

I'm working on this now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4171486#4171486 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4171486

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums August 2008