August 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMICROCONT-330 - Preconfigured MDR and scopes

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | We're back to the same problem: | How to map some ID from deployers (we set some predetermined metadata), | to a bean's ScopeInfo, where our only info is className and bean's name, | no idea if the bean is gonna be scoped. | The idea is that every Component/ControllerContext has a GUID. When you create the ControllerContext from the Component, you copy the GUID. The INSTANCE scope would then just be INSTANCE/GUID rather than INSTANCE/BeanName. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4170273#4170273 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4170273

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MDR doesn't work on annotated privates

by adrian＠jboss.org

"wolfc" wrote : | What is the exact function of MethodSignature as opposed to Method? The idea is that eventually MDR will support loading annotations before the class is loaded, e.g. for AOP using javassist in that case you can't use the Method as the key, you've got to use the "signature". Of course, people that use it at runtime can still use the Method. Your problem is that there is no way to define @Inherited for a non-class Annotation. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/annotation/Inherited.html Sub.class.getMethod("postConstruct").getAnnotation(PostConstruct.class) == null is the correct behaviour absent some other semantic/hack and therefore it should be the behaviour of the MetaData. We could try to simulate this behaviour where you could configure somewhere that @PostConstruct should do an @Inherited like behaviour at the method level then make the AnnotatedElementMetaDataLoader do the extra work for those annotations. I remember discussing this issue about 6 months ago? e.g. whether it should also search interfaces (with the multiple inheritance problem it would cause) but nothing came of the discussion. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4170268#4170268 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4170268

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: With Ganymede the jPDL Designer has a strange appearance

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

This is due to the new version of GEF AFAICS. Nothing wrong with your code or the GPD. Regards, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4170264#4170264 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4170264

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Integrating aop-mc-int bean metadata with AS5

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | But this one has annotation directly on the class, | I'll try to do the same as you - adding it via BMDBuilder. This works as well: - http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-deployers/trunk/dep... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4170263#4170263 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4170263

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Integrating aop-mc-int bean metadata with AS5

by alesj

I've added bean that has @Aliases to this test: - http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-deployers/trunk/dep... and it works as it should. But this one has annotation directly on the class, I'll try to do the same as you - adding it via BMDBuilder. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4170249#4170249 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4170249

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - With Ganymede the jPDL Designer has a strange appearance

by SidKennedy

Hello to all, a week ago I switched to Ganymede. As I extend the jPDL Graphical Process Designer a little bit I need the GEF as well. But there is a strange effect with Ganymede. With Eclipse 3.3 the PaletteGroups looked like this screenshot I have from the JBoss-website http://www.jboss.org/file-access/default/members/jbossjbpm/images/gpd_exa... Since I'm using with Ganyemede it looks like this http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~s2658050/gpd_ganymede.png As you can see there is the strange effect with the white area where the PaletteEntry(s) are situated and there aren't categories anymore. I debugged the code of creation of the entries within its groups and it seems to be correctly. So can you help me if the source of my problem lies in GEF (maybe it's a bug) or in the GPD-sources (I checked out the last version of the 3.1.x source tree HEAD/jbpm.3/designer/jpdl/org.jbpm.gd.jpdl)? greetz Sid View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4170239#4170239 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4170239

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: TransactionManager and AS' ServiceBindingManager

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

The pojo version of SBM is now being used in AS trunk. Let me know what bindings you'll want and I can add them to the bindings.xml file the AS uses (or, if you want to do it yourself, it's at https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/trunk/server/src/etc/conf/default/bin....) Currently it has this related to the transaction manager: |  | |  | <bean class="org.jboss.services.binding.ServiceBinding"> | <constructor> | <parameter>TransactionManager</parameter> | <parameter>${jboss.bind.address}</parameter> | <parameter>4712</parameter> | </constructor> | </bean> But that is unused, really more of a temporary placeholder, so it can be changed as you wish. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4170202#4170202 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4170202

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: ProfileService equiv to ServiceBindingManager

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

The current AS trunk has been switched over to this new impl. There are still two services that are not integrated properly with it, so starting two servers using SBM will not work. But it didn't work before either; so now at least people can work off of the new implementation. The testsuite includes a tests-binding-manager target that starts two instances with the same -b but different binding sets and confirms all services deploy on both. This passes, because I used a couple test-configs to work around the 2 missing services. The main testing of this is in the varia and system-jmx projects. Threads discussing the 2 remaining missing services: 1) JBM: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4169967#4169967 2) TransactionManager: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=140667 The latter will require a new jbossts release; former is more a coordination issue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4170197#4170197 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4170197

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: ProfileService equiv to ServiceBindingManager

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

This implementation was just checked in -- like 30 seconds ago ;) To get the implemenation jar, you'd need to check out the current head of the AS trunk and build it. Once you've done that the jar can be found in build/output/jboss-5.0.0.CR2/server/.../lib/jboss-bindingservice.jar or in varia/output/lib/jboss-bindingservice.jar I'm curious what you'd do with just the jar though, as opposed to the entire AS that uses it (which the current head now does.) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4170192#4170192 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4170192

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: ProfileService equiv to ServiceBindingManager

by anuman36

Do you have a test implementation library for the Pojo based ServiceBindingManager? The currently bundled bindingservice-plugin.jar has ServiceBinding and ServiceBindingManager implementations in it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4170189#4170189 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4170189

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums August 2008