"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : dynamic meaning anything org.apache.InstanceManager passes in other than the web-app.xml components. If jsf does not flow through this than that's a problem. There is a jsf bean issue that would indicate these beans are being passed through:
| https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-4399
|
Hmm well i briefly ran a jsf test, but could not see that the TomcatInjectionContainer was called for jsf beans.
There is also org.jboss.web.jsf.integration.injection.JBossInjectionProvider.java which seems to handle the injection for managed beans, but i haven't really looked at that.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4169389#4169389
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4169389
"bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : There is a binary (which goes in server/all/lib) and a config file patch attached to JBCLUSTER-206. If you see if that has an impact, it would be great. I'd rather see the thread dumps than results with this new jar.
I will give it a shot with this new jar. How about I give you both: result and thread dumps.
Should I stick with the current cache configuration which is PL+RC+Inv_Synch for hibernate and BR in jboss-web-cluster.sar?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4169388#4169388
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4169388