September 2008 - jboss-dev-forums

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Some maven updates

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

The following fails for me with the new build | ./build.sh release -DJROCKIT_HOME=/Users/kabir/Java/libs/jrockit | ... | | BUILD FAILED | /Users/kabir/sourcecontrol/jboss-aop/build/build.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line: | /Users/kabir/sourcecontrol/jboss-aop/build/build-release.xml:161: Warning: Could not find file /Users/kabir/sourcecontrol/jboss-aop/aop/output/lib/jrockit-pluggable-instrumentor.jar to copy. | | Total time: 1 minute 29 seconds | There is no jrockit-pluggable-instrumentor.jar in either the aop or the pluggable-instrumentor modules. I assume that is because my JROCKIT_HOME is being ignored? I tried adding it to a build/local.properties file, but that did not work? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178127#4178127 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178127

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Differences in config between eap 43 and as 5

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Ok.. I kept the /integration/AS5 and /integration/EAP as they are now. and the diffs are fixed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178125#4178125 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178125

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Differences in config between eap 43 and as 5

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I want to create a generic directory under integration where the files that don't have any change will be placed. /integration/generic Later, I will need to change the bisocket configuration as the following: <attribute name="socket.check_connection" isParam="true">false</attribute> | <attribute name="serverBindAddress">${jboss.bind.address}</attribute> | <attribute name="serverBindPort">${jbm.bisocket.port:4457}</attribute> | <attribute name="clientSocketClass" isParam="true">org.jboss.jms.client.remoting.ClientSocketWrapper</attribute> | That config would also make the EAP, and that shouldn't cause any config incompatibilities. Tim, do you see a problem with any of this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178120#4178120 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178120

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Some maven updates

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

"pgier" wrote : | Should JRockitClassPreProcessor also be included only in the jrockit jar? Currently it is only being included in the main jboss-aop.jar. | JRockitClassPreProcessor should be in the main jar for standalone apps. JRockitPluggableClassPreprocessor should be in jrockit-pluggable-instrumentor.jar for use with AS View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178117#4178117 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178117

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Status of documentation in Branch_1_4

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

That's the documentation from Branch_Stable, intended for JBoss5. I was just saying that merging those docs will require some writing to adjust the text. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178102#4178102 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178102

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Differences in config between eap 43 and as 5

by timfox

There should only be a difference where there really needs to be a real difference. Any other differences due to whitespace, formatting, comments etc should be made the same, otherwise it's going to be harder to maintain View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178100#4178100 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178100

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Branch_1_4 build-messaging.properties...

by timfox

Ok, fair enough View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178098#4178098 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178098

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Differences in config between eap 43 and as 5

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

When you talked about merging, I thought you were referring to having only one file between AS5 and EAP. At the moment (unless we make few changes) we need two versions for the reasons I pointed out. We can of course minimize those differences. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178097#4178097 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178097

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Status of documentation in Branch_1_4

by timfox

You didn't answer the question, where the current documentation you put in Branch_1_4 came from? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178096#4178096 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178096

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Differences in config between eap 43 and as 5

by timfox

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : | - The JGroups config should be also different. JBoss5 will use the ChannelFactory. | Ok, that's a couple of lines difference anonymous wrote : | - messaging-service.xml will be totally different on JBoss5. They have a different SecurityMetadataStore. | No, it shouldn't be totally different. Just a few lines different on security store config anonymous wrote : | - Soon JBossRemoting will be also different as the BindingManager is now based on property-substitution for the ports and not any more on that sausage-like XML. This is not relevant to the discussion - we are talking about differences in *our source tree* not some other differences in jboss 5 source tree. So... there should just be a few lines different, but i am seeing 2700 lines diff in the diff. Most of that is probably whitespace or comments, but it should be merged. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178094#4178094 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178094

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2008