September 2008 - jboss-dev-forums

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Merging Branch_Stable and Branch_CP as a single branch..

by timfox

If this will only take a couple of days, I think we should bite the bullet. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4177027#4177027 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4177027

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Deployment Framework] - Datasource deployer does not substitute system properties

by scotto

We use system property substitution to assist with the configuration of our JBoss installations. This was working fine with JBoss 4.2.3.GA, however it appears to be broken in 5.0.0.CR1. Specifically, it appears that system properties are not being substituted when deploying datasources. For example, consider this default-ds.xml: | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <datasources> | <local-tx-datasource> | <jndi-name>DefaultDS</jndi-name> | <connection-url>${vieo.datasource.url}</connection-url> | <driver-class>${vieo.datasource.driver}</driver-class> | <user-name>${vieo.datasource.user}</user-name> | <password>${vieo.datasource.password}</password> |  | <metadata> | <type-mapping>PostgreSQL 8.0</type-mapping> | </metadata> |  | <min-pool-size>${vieo.datasource.poolsize.min}</min-pool-size> |  | <max-pool-size>${vieo.datasource.poolsize.max}</max-pool-size> | </local-tx-datasource> | </datasources> | With JBoss 4.2.3.GA we are successfully able to configure the datasource using properties supplied by the SystemPropertiesService. With JBoss 5.0.0.CR1 it appears the property substitution is not performed, and the datasource fails to deploy correctly. To confirm this, we changed the jndi-name property line to the following: | <jndi-name>${vieo.datasource.name}</jndi-name> | and then added -Dvieo.datasource.name=DefaultDS to the JVM command line. The server log confirms that the system property is not being substituted: anonymous wrote : | 2008-09-17 16:31:00,948 41048 INFO [org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.ConnectionFactoryBindingService] (main:) Bound Connection | Manager 'jboss.jca:service=DataSourceBinding,name=${vieo.datasource.name}' to JNDI name 'java:${vieo.datasource.name}' | The strange thing is that this same system property substitution DOES work for all other deployment files types (other than datasources), including mail-service.xml, jbossweb.sar/server.xml, messaging/messaging-service.xml, etc. Is this behaviour to be expected, or is it a bug with the datasource deployer? Thanks Scott View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4177022#4177022 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4177022

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Eclipse code formatter and code cleanup profiles

by timfox

I have actually moved this now to trunk/ide-settings/eclipse so it doesn't clog up trunk. Andy - if you can put your intellij profiles in trunk/ide-settings/intellij that would be good View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4177021#4177021 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4177021

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: Removing SFSB in HttpSessionListener

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

"bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : "pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : (which leads to the SFSB's remove method being called unless you explicitly ask it not to). | | How do you "explicitly ask it not to"? The timing of this work is being driven by a support case where the customer is having issues because of the sessionDestroyed call. If there's a workaround, that would be great. You can annotate separate methods @Destroys and @Removes on your SFSB - this will lead to the remove method not being called when the component is destroyed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4177020#4177020 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4177020

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Eclipse code formatter and code cleanup profiles

by timfox

I have committed these in the root of trunk. Can all eclipse users make sure they are using this for any work done on JBM? Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4177016#4177016 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4177016

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: JNDI Bindings

by wolfc

>From an EJB3 perspective jboss.xml jndi-name is deprecated, mapped-name should be used instead. You can have remote-binding elements in the descriptor and these can have jndi-name. They're under a session element. We should really have a remote binding bindings (hmm) in the assembly element. Then you can re-use the annotated remote bindings or completely override them (with jndi-name being the identifier). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4177008#4177008 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4177008

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Messages are lost on Queue?

by timfox

The examples don't even use ExceptionListeners, so I don't see what difference it would make if they were called or not. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4177007#4177007 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4177007

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Messages are lost on Queue?

by timfox

Can you explain why you would want failure listeners to be called on destroy, and why that is causing the problem you are experiencing? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4177005#4177005 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4177005

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: WS EJB invocation

by wolfc

The current implementation relies on the start of Ejb3Deployment to fill in the appropriate meta data, but there is no explicit dependency defined anywhere on the Ejb3Deployment object. So the WebServiceDeployerEJB can run before the Ejb3Deployment is started hence a NPE (https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5968). I think the logic in WebServiceDeployerEJB should be moved to WebServiceDeployment, so it can have that dependency defined. In reality the web service end point should depend on the ejb container. I don't know yet how to resolve it to that point. Having an object name lying around somewhere is not the way to go (https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1335). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4177002#4177002 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4177002

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: JNDI Bindings

by ALRubinger

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Additive meaning create duplicate bindings? The metadata processing should already be treating mappedName annotation as being overriden by the jboss jndi-name. We don't have an xml form for @RemoteBinding.jndiName do we? Ah, I wasn't aware jboss.xml "jndi-name" overrides spec "mappedName". No, we've got no XML @RemoteBinding equiv, or way of specifying more than one (ie JNDI Name) in XML. This was probably not the original intent, but @RemoteBinding as it stands tangles: * JNDI Targets * clientBindUrl (invokerLocator and protocol) * Interceptor Stack * Proxy Factory TBH, I'm not even sure which of those are currently supported. ...so I'm starting to wonder about this notion of creating duplicate bindings. The waters get murky and confusing either way, and I want to provide the most intuitive mechanism we can (with much better logging). JNDI problems are at the top of the gripes of new users. Also related (noted before) is the absence of LocalBindingMetaData/LocalBindingsMetaData. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176999#4176999 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176999

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2008