September 2008 - jboss-dev-forums

[Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: Handling soft versus hard pooledInvoker exceptions in JR

by ScottMarlowNovell

The clustered unit tests passed. I'll merge the change to trunk + 4_2. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176584#4176584 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176584

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Modularising the appserver bootstrap

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

Ah yes, thanks for reminding me :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176582#4176582 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176582

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Modularising the appserver bootstrap

by adrian＠jboss.org

Well don't forget that trunk is currently under a freeze. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176581#4176581 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176581

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Modularising the appserver bootstrap

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I'll look into this ASAP, should probably be able to fix tomorrow https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAOP-644 https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAOP-645 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176579#4176579 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176579

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[QA of JBoss Portal] - Re: WSRP admin UI: Null pointer exception

by chris.laprun＠jboss.com

Not sure why this happens... but it doesn't happen in 2.7 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176577#4176577 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176577

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Major refactoring of the jbpm3 core test suite

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

> can you explain how you make sure that each test starts from a clean DB ? The system exits on tearDown() when there are records left in the DB. A test that does this is invalid and not allowed to enter the test suite. > turned out to be very impractical and tedious indeed > those are typically very hard to find not if the invalid test is immediately rejected > so far, clearing the whole db has proven to work well If so, there should be successful hudson runs that show that. Rather the opposite is true. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176571#4176571 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176571

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - Re: Using customized RMI socket factory with JBOSSSerializat

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I'm sorry I didn't realize this post before... This would require some debugging.... Maybe a testcase to reproduce this problem. With the information you sent, I have no idea what's happening. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176551#4176551 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176551

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: Handling soft versus hard pooledInvoker exceptions in JR

by ScottMarlowNovell

Brian, Assigning two static IPs to my regular NIC, did the trick! Thanks for the tip. Scott View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176549#4176549 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176549

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Major refactoring of the jbpm3 core test suite

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

can you explain how you make sure that each test starts from a clean DB ? i also played with the idea that each test should delete its own generated data explicitely. but that turned out to be very impractical and tedious. usually when you forget to delete a record (and this can be very unexpected) it is not a problem so you won't know at that time. then when after a while a test might be created or changed and that might lead to a clash. those are typically very hard to find. so far, clearing the whole db has proven to work well. but i'm open to hearing alternatives if you think they are better. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176548#4176548 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176548

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - jboss.entity.manager.factory.jndi.name

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

"carlo" wrote : This function doesn't work anymore in the current jpa deployers release: | | | | See | http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/jpa/trunk/dep... | at the bottom. | | For the moment a persistence unit can only be injected. Any idea when this will be fixed? We can work around this in Seam, but it's nice to have. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4176536#4176536 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4176536

17 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2008