January 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Failing invoker tests

by ALRubinger

"ALRubinger" wrote : Will revisit to get this failing instead. Failing properly now. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201180#4201180 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201180

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Revert of r82615 / EJBTHREE-1653

by ALRubinger

"pferraro" wrote : Ah - I finally found the issue... | Changes to JBossASKernel in ejb3 as module (r82684) dropped a re-entrancy requirement for EJBContainer.create()... Just cleared this up w/ Paul. The requirement is of the failing test, not of the Container contracts. Also @see http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=148497. I'll be looking at a backwards-compatible solution until we can safely patch AS5 GA. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201171#4201171 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201171

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Using ClassInfo in AOP

by stale.pedersen＠jboss.org

i started changing the pointcut matchers to use ClassInfo instead of CtClass just to get a grasp of things and it seems that is not easy to "only" change matchers or instrumentor, etc. look at just creating org.jboss.aop.pointcut.Util.matchesClassExpr(ClassExpression classExpr, ClassInfo classInfo, Advisor advisor) to work similar as the javassist/reflect version. then we need to create a ClassInfo "version" of org.jboss.aop.annotation.PortableAnnotationElement. isAnyAnnotationPresent(...). this method needs uses javassist.ClassFile to fetch annotationinformation regarding the visibility of the annotation. these kind of methods are not available in jboss-reflect AnnotationType/AnnotationValue/TypeInfo afaik. so either we end up using javassist for these kind of operations (which is totally against why we do it in the first place) or we need to get a better overview of what functionality we need from the reflect api to use it in aop. atm im only thinking of the non-mutable-info we need, but maybe we should include the mutableinfo discussion into this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201149#4201149 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201149

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Incompatible change to JBossASKernel

by wolfc

I say revert JBossASKernel and have ServiceContainer use existing working construct to get the same functionality. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201127#4201127 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201127

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Incompatible change to JBossASKernel

by ALRubinger

I should have posted this before. To clarify, JBossASKernel is now incompatible w/ ejb3-core:1.0.0-Beta11 and under, (used in AS 5.0.0.GA). So this in turn means that the Plugin is no longer compatible with AS 5.0.0GA. This is begging for a better solution, both to the "patching 5.0.0.GA" problem as well as patching AS looking forward. For the latter I'll be starting to remove the "ejb3" module from AS when TestSuite work is completed; will post a new Thread when this is to start. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201105#4201105 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201105

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1669 : @Service tutorial on JBoss-5.0 GA

by ALRubinger

"jaikiran" wrote : I meant AS5.x branch Ah yes, Branch_5_x was made around the time I merged from trunk to Branch_5_0. I've now merged the JBossASKernel changes into Branch_5_x as well. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201102#4201102 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201102

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - DistributedTopicTest failures

by gaohoward

Hi sometimes I got test failures in running DistributedTopicTest class. The testClusteredTopicSharedDurableNoLocalSubPersistent and clusteredTopicSharedDurableNoLocalSub. The tests do the following: 1. create three connections (con1, con2, con3) on node 0, 1, and 2. 2. create three session (sess1, sess2 and sess3) on con1, 2 and 3 respectively 3. create 2 durable subscribers (cons1 and cons2) on the topic at node 1 and 2 respectively 4. create a producer (prod) on the topic at node 0. 5. after starting connections, prod sends 100 messages to topic at node 0. 6. as there is no receivers at node 0, all the messages will be received by cons1 and cons2 on the other two nodes. The tests assumes that the messages will be sucked over to the two nodes in a round robin way, which is not always the case. See ServerSessionEndpoint.promptDelivery(Channel channel): this.executor.execute(new Runnable() { public void run() { channel.deliver();} } ); The deliver() on node1 and node2 is triggered when con2 and con3 is started. Each deliver() will cause the sucker began to suck messages from node0. If the sucker on node 1 (sucker-node-1) and on node2 (sucker-node-2) both become available when node 0 starts to deliver messages, then the message will be distributed to sucker-node-1 and sucker-node-2 in round robin fashion. However because the deliver() is executed aynchronously, you cannot guarantee that they are both ready when node 0 starts to deliver the first message. It is possible that the first several messages are delivered to only one of the two nodes while the other is still not available (thread scheduling). If we insert some time delay before sending messages, that'll give more time for both nodes become ready and the test will be more stable. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201101#4201101 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201101

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Incompatible change to JBossASKernel

by wolfc

With changes r82684 & r82689 JBossASKernel has become incompatible with ejb3-core. This leads to the following problem when trying to deploy service beans into a patched AS GA: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200935#4200935 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201099#4201099 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201099

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: [JBMESSAGING-1367] Create JCA resource adapter for JBM 2

by jesper.pedersen

Thanks, Tim - I'll go in this direction now. We can always worry about the inbound part when we get to that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201096#4201096 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201096

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: [JBMESSAGING-1367] Create JCA resource adapter for JBM 2

by timfox

"jesper.pedersen" wrote : Mhmm, since the outbound part of the adaptor needs to expose the JMS 1.1 API it maybe would be better to use the jms.client package for the foundation instead of core.client. | | E.g. the managed connection factory keeps a JBossConnectionFactory instance. | | It seems like it would save a lot of duplicated work. | | What are your thoughts on this ? +1 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201094#4201094 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201094

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2009