December 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Embedded JBoss Development] - Re: Embedded API Design Problems

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

You expressed what I wanted to say more properly David, I used wrong wording. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269105#4269105 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269105

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] - Re: Testing Deployers with new Reflect + ClassPool

by alesj

"flavia.rainone(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Now I'm curious... why isn't ClassNotFoundException being thrown? The ClassLoader.loadClass() API is clear about CNFE being thrown if a class can't be found. We're not loading class from ClassLoader, but from our custom API - ClassLoaderDomain / Loader. Hence we can do whatever we want. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269081#4269081 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269081

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] - Re: Testing Deployers with new Reflect + ClassPool

by flavia.rainone＠jboss.com

>From a MicrocontainerTestDelegate, I have created a parent policy for the default domain that excludes all classes from package excludes. Now, if you try to do a domain.loadClass(A.class.getName()), for example, it will return null as expected. So far so good. But this does not seem to be enough. All tests are failing because of TestScenario.cannotLoadClass(L loader, String className). This method asserts that loader cannot load className. It is failing because the default domain enters this block: BaseClassLoaderPolicy policy = classLoader.getPolicy(); | ClassLoader hack = policy.isJDKRequest(name); | if (hack != null) | { | if (trace) | log.trace(this + " trying to load " + name + " using hack " + hack); | Class<?> result = Class.forName(name, false, hack); | if (result != null) | { | if (trace) | log.trace(this + " loaded from hack " + hack + " " + ClassLoaderUtils.classToString(result)); | globalClassCache.put(path, new ClassCacheItem(result)); | return result; | } | } So I thought: adding the class to the JDKChecker.getExcludes collection should do the trick. The requesting class returned by AbstractJDKChecker.getRequestingClass() is SanityTestScenario. Adding this class to the excludes collection also causes the tests to fail. Now, calls to classLoader.loadClass(String className), that should return a class loaded by a BaseClassLoader, are returning a class loaded by the AppClassLoader. Does anybody has any ideas of a possible workaround to this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269079#4269079 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269079

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AS Development] - Re: Naming over Remoting 3

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

We probably should go with the correct spelling either way. I thought maybe the google data would give an obvious answer, but it just muddied the waters a bit more. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269077#4269077 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269077

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AS Development] - Re: Naming over Remoting 3

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

The google data is just reinforcing the fact that developers can't spell :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269076#4269076 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269076

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss ESB Development] - Problem with ftp listener

by zlytomek

I have a service whis is processing some data from an ftp listener on jboss esb which works just fine on my local machine, but when i'm deploying it on my test-production server it doesn't run at all, the log says that deplyment went fine, no problems, but then nothing happends, i've increased loggin level for esb classes and i found something like this: 2009-12-04 18:49:57,005 DEBUG [DataCollector] gateway-name= does not match service=JBPMDatabaseInitializer (yes, empty gateway-name) repeated for all existing services. Any ideas anyone? configuration: <providers> | <ftp-provider name="SranDocumentsFTPprovider" | hostname="somehost"> | <ftp-bus busid="sranDocumentsFTPChannel"> | <ftp-message-filter username="someuser" password="somepassword" | passive="false" | directory="/home/whatever/scanner/inbound" | input-suffix="" | work-suffix=".processing" | post-delete="false" | post-directory="/home/whatever/scanner/processed" | post-suffix=".processed" | error-delete="false" | error-directory="/home/whatever/scanner/error" | error-suffix=".error" /> | </ftp-bus> | </ftp-provider> | | <jms-provider name="JBossMQ" connection-factory="ConnectionFactory"> | <jms-bus busid="sranDocumentJmsChannel"> | <jms-message-filter dest-type="QUEUE" dest-name="queue/scan_documents_queue" selector="type='whatever'" /> | </jms-bus> | </jms-provider> | </providers> | | <services> | <service category="SranerServiceCategory" name="SranerService" description="whatever"> | <listeners> | <ftp-listener | name="FtpGateway" | busidref="sranDocumentsFTPChannel" | is-gateway="true" | maxThreads="3" | schedule-frequency="30"> | </ftp-listener> | <jms-listener name="SranDocumentsAction" busidref="sranDocumentJmsChannel" /> | </listeners> | <actions mep="OneWay"> | <action name="ProcessSranDocuments" class="somepackage.ProcessSranedDocument"> | <property name="message" value="Starting sran action..." /> | </action> | </actions> | </service> | </services> View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269070#4269070 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269070

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AS Development] - Re: Naming over Remoting 3

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Ok, never mind, invokable is fine. :) TBH, it bugged me a lot, because it seemed either a spelling error or us coining an unnecessary neologism for something not particularly sexy. But google clearly shows we're not coining a neologism; that spelling is used all over the place in software. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269065#4269065 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269065

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] - Re: Testing Deployers with new Reflect + ClassPool

by flavia.rainone＠jboss.com

"alesj" wrote : | | public Class<?> loadClass(String name) | | { | | try | | { | | return loadClass(null, name, true); | | } | | catch (ClassNotFoundException e) | | { | | return null; | | } | | } Now I'm curious... why isn't ClassNotFoundException being thrown? The ClassLoader.loadClass() API is clear about CNFE being thrown if a class can't be found. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269059#4269059 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269059

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] - Re: Adding getAnnotationsAnnotatedWith() to MDR

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

What I have so far has been committed against https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREFLECT-82. I have not done anything about caching in CachingMetaDataContext or changed the SimpleCacheMetaDataContextUnitTestCase and SimpleCacheParentMetaDataContextUnitTestCase tests, which I guess work with CachingMetaDataContext? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269058#4269058 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269058

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AS Development] - Re: Naming over Remoting 3

by ALRubinger

"bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : OT: what's up with invokable with a k? "Invocable" is actually a dictionary word[1] not just a geek neologism. | | [1] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/invocable Interesting. I figured because the base was "invoke"... http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/invokable < This isn't a real dictionary If someone's got strong feelings on either side, refactor the relevant classes. :) S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269053#4269053 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4269053

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2009