February 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Backing the Web Beans Application scope

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

Notes for Ales to implement: Before calling Bootstrap.initialize() you need to call Application.setApplicationContext(BeanStore beanStore); BeanStore is https://svn.jboss.org/repos/webbeans/ri/trunk/webbeans-ri-spi/src/main/ja... - basically a Map<Conextual<?>, Object> with the get, put and remove generified. Do you want to be notified on shutdown? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212928#4212928 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212928

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of OSGi Integration] - New project structure

by alesj

In order to support more than just our own OSGi impl, we decided to re-factor current project structure. We'll be adding new "Runtime" module to the project, and since some of the work overlaps, this calls for a structure revamp. :-) I'll explain what is the "purpose" of each of the nodes in the structure. * JBoss OSGi ** Repository *** API (OBR API) *** Impl (possible ORB API impl); we should take some existing ** Our OSGi impl - we need a _real_ project name, any suggestion welcome ;-) *** Boot (minimal boot); re-using new JBoss Boostrap split *** Deployers (custom deployers) *** Facade (core OSGi API impl) ** Runtime (plugable platform for various OSGi frameworks, including our) *** SPI (framework abstraction) *** Deployers (custom deployers) *** "Our impl" integration *** Felix integration *** Equinox integration (optional) *** Knopflerfish integration (optional) ** Services (glue code, no real impl) *** Console (integration work/patch to re-use existing) *** HttpService (integration work/patch to re-use existing) ** Common (shared code between "Our impl" and Runtime) *** MetaData *** Deployers The effort of having "Runtime" is to provide initial testing ground for TCK. Once we pick up the pace with "Our Impl", we'll put minimal effort into "Runtime". It should be then mostly demand driven. "Services" module holds the pieces that glue/integrate "Runtime" with JBossAS due to missing architecture. e.g. Embedded Tomcat/JBossWeb or decent Console Once we have "Our impl", the console work should really be just a matter of exposing services via Managed/Metatype project and possibly embedded/standalone ProfileService. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212915#4212915 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212915

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4 2.0 package name clashes

by ataylor

Ok, I would svn update now View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212913#4212913 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212913

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4 2.0 package name clashes

by ataylor

Ok, I'll rename and check in View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212896#4212896 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212896

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4 2.0 package name clashes

by timfox

OK that was a misunderstanding. When I said wait, I was referring to the global change, but assumed you'd do the rename of util until then. :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212894#4212894 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212894

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4 2.0 package name clashes

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : He was going to rename util for now as a temp measure then we were going to rename everything when we're code complete. No, th eplan was to rename to org.jboss.jbm at the end of dev, which hasn't been done. anonymous wrote : Maybe they shouldn't coexist in AS. AS 5.1 may ship with both 1.4 and 2.0 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212893#4212893 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212893

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4 2.0 package name clashes

by jmesnil

I didn't do the renaming: we decided to wait and make a global renaming of our root package just before releasing 2.0 beta. Andyi, if it prevents you to continue to integrate JBM 2 with JBoss AS, I'm +1 to rename the util package (it's the only package in both versions of JBM iirc) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212892#4212892 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212892

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4 2.0 package name clashes

by gaohoward

Maybe they shouldn't coexist in AS. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212890#4212890 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212890

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4 2.0 package name clashes

by timfox

Hasn't Jeff already done this? See http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=148577 He was going to rename util for now as a temp measure then we were going to rename everything when we're code complete. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212889#4212889 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212889

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - 1.4 2.0 package name clashes

by ataylor

the package org.jboss.messaging.util is in both 1.4 and 2.0. I was going to rename it to org.jboss.messaging.utils in the short term. Unless any one has a better idea? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212882#4212882 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212882

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2009