February 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Identity] - Re: Provisioning

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

It looks like even SPML would want to use an underlying provisioning API. If the API is properly designed, then SPML or any of the other four things you list should be pretty easy to come up with. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212437#4212437 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212437

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Identity] - Re: Provisioning

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

"aamonten" wrote : what about a plugin for jopr, thats my idea for SSO when someday I can restart the project. Of course, the following come into mind: 1) Jopr 2) Guvnor 3) Portlet based admin console. 4) Custom GUI. Again there is commonality here. Can these work off of a layer of provisioning sitting on top of idm? There is a specification in this area - SPML. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPML View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212433#4212433 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212433

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Identity] - Re: Provisioning

by aamonten

what about a plugin for jopr, thats my idea for SSO when someday I can restart the project. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212431#4212431 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212431

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Identity] - Provisioning

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

In an Identity Management solution, there has to be means to do provisioning. Mainly CRUD of users, roles on a regular basis. I would like to get your ideas on whether: a) one unified solution in the idm subproject would be good or b) provide plug points where external vendor users can plug in to idm to do the provisioning. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212430#4212430 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212430

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Backing the Web Beans Application scope

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : Other could have their own 'MC', | in GF's case it would be a BundleActivator + boot service. | (I guess we could provide this one as well, for proof of concept) | The GF guys are happy to do the GF work I think :-) as long as we provide SPIs they like. This was the only real issue that came up during my meeting with them... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212402#4212402 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212402

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - [JBAS-5221] tx-connection-factory/no-tx-connection-factory n

by jesper.pedersen

Scott, I have begun to look at this task. Can you specify a bit more what you are looking for ? Is it the setManagedConnectionFactoryProperties method you are looking for ? Also is the code currently using the correct API ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212400#4212400 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212400

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Backing the Web Beans Application scope

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : "pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | | | Ales and I had some ideas for how to back it: | | | | * non-serializable JNDI | | * EJB3.1 singleton | | * MBean server. | | | | Thoughts? | As discussed now, I think a plain MC bean is enough. | Perhaps we could only push it into own scoped Kernel/Controller? | I mean, for running in MC controller envs. But I think we could already provide some other impls, e.g. like the one's stated above. Other could have their own 'MC', in GF's case it would be a BundleActivator + boot service. (I guess we could provide this one as well, for proof of concept) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212398#4212398 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212398

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Security services deployer for the MC

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

At the moment there's provisions for deploying other JCA providers (like BouncyCastle) though I'm not sure I can/should keep that (the JDK has its own provider deployment mechanism and there isn't a great way to make them play together that I can see). As for providing alternate implementations, I do not have any plans to do so at this time, though these services can work with any provider implementation. I chose the name because all these provided services relate specifically to cryptography, so it seems to make sense to me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212395#4212395 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212395

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Security services deployer for the MC

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

"david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : I'm going to change the name of this to "cryptography services" to avoid confusion with any other security-related projects. DML, it is mainly config used by the JDK crypto stuff. Right? I am unsure if you plan to provide any crypto implementation. If the former, then the name can be misleading. If the latter, we should discuss. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212394#4212394 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212394

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Strings Experiments...

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Just to complete this task / thread, after some simplification on the UTF8Util class, I could get better numbers | Time WriteUTF = 2193 | Time WriteUTF = 2174 | Time WriteUTF = 2192 | Time WriteUTF = 2177 | Time WriteUTF = 2198 | | Time readUTF = 2375 | Time readUTF = 2304 | Time readUTF = 2309 | Time readUTF = 2305 | Time readUTF = 2311 | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4212393#4212393 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4212393

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2009