February 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by camunda

heiko wrote : well, it's a trivial task. isn't it? Yepp, I scheduled it for today (and only today ;-)). View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208937#4208937 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208937

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by camunda

I see more and more projects moving to EJB3. The stuff is easier to understand and even easier to deploy. Actually only having EJB 2.1 support sometimes let jbpm looks "old-fashioned" (never underestimate the marketing factor!). And as I mentioned, I am asked quite a lot for ejb3. Since you often include jbpm in your own environment or application ejb 3 offers better support. E.g. extending the beans or adding interceptors is easier. And some stuff seems to be better supported with EJB 3 in respect to clustering. Currently I am rewriting it anyway, so the question comes to if I should commit it, the effort would be reduced to maintenance. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208936#4208936 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208936

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

well, it's a trivial task. isn't it? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208935#4208935 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208935

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

in many corporate environments, it will take quite a while before ejb 3 gets adopted. if we offer ejb 2 beans, developers in those businesses can just deploy them. whereas they might not be able to deploy ejb 3 beans. ejb 3 is nicer for us to write, but that is not a good argument. all containers that have ejb3 also can run ejb 2. and we have already ejb 2 versions. so i don't see the point in spending effort to rebuild our own beans on ejb 3 and by doing so limit the number of environments that jbpm can be deployed in. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208930#4208930 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208930

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | building ejb 3 versions of the command service and timer service do not make sense to me. | it wasn't dicussed yet. that's what we are doing atm. But what are your concerns? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208925#4208925 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208925

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by camunda

Sorry, the latter was (building ejb3 command and job service and timer). Why doesn't this make sense to you? Because it doesn't add new functionality? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208924#4208924 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208924

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by camunda

So it would maybe help if I commit it for jbpm 3? ;-) Maybe I can also volunteer to port it to jbpm 4 afterwards, but I am not yet sure if I have the time... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208923#4208923 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208923

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

where was that discussed ? i want to verify the following points: adding support for storing ejb 3 entities as process variables makes sense to me. building ejb 3 versions of the command service and timer service do not make sense to me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208920#4208920 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208920

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jbpm 4 module dependencies

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

right. the tests depend indeed on jpdl. though the enterprise sources should only depend on pvm. so i'll mark the dependency on jpdl with scope 'test'. ok ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208919#4208919 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208919

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

I was looking into that for jbpm4 as well. But didn't make any progress so far. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208917#4208917 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208917

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2009