February 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: [JBMESSAGING-1367] Create JCA resource adapter for JBM 2

by timfox

What's the advantage of pooling the sessions for inbound? (I can see the advantage for outbound) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207625#4207625 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4207625

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: 2 root elements question

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

Sure. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207614#4207614 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4207614

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: 2 root elements question

by jeff.zhang

I would like use this feature. ;) I had notice there is jbossxb-2.0.1.Beta1.jar in svn repo, is it ok if I change metadata pom.xml to use xb 2.0.1B1? To use 2 roots, I could just follow usage of testcase, like SchemaBinding schema = JBossXBBuilder.build(MainRootMainNs.class, YetAnotherRootMainNs.class, AnotherRootMainNs.class); is it correct? Thanks a lot View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207610#4207610 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4207610

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: logging too verbose

by sriswasadmin

Hi All, Where can i get patch for this issue.. i am using jboss4.3.. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207600#4207600 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4207600

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Bringing the trunk profile service changes to 5_x

by emuckenhuber

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : I took a look at merging the current trunk profile service changes into the Branch_5_x using just the 6.0.0.Alpha3 org.jboss.integration:jboss-profileservice-spi, but I see it has dependencies on updated deployer classes like org.jboss.deployers.client.plugins.deployment.AbstractDeployment. Are we going to be able to update the deployers and related jars? | Hmm actually the idea was to make the spi independent of the deployers project. Therefore we might want to drop the AttachmentStore from the spi, because it's actually creating a real Deployment. Furthermore - what's actually DeploymentTemplate.updateTemplate supposed to do? It's not implemented and i'm wondering why you should not call ManagementView.updateComponent ? Which is then the last thing referencing a VFSDeployment. The implementation uses the AbstractDeployment only because there is no DeploymentFactory.getInstance(), but shouldn't the AbstractDeployment already be in 5_x? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207596#4207596 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4207596

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Deployment cleanup & modifications

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : "alesj" wrote : | | Does this look legit enough? | | | This needs more work, as sub-deployments don't have Deployment instance. | I'll dig further. I'll re-write this as part of Deployers sub-project. The usage will be simple: | public interface StructureModificationChecker | { | /** | * Has structure been modified. | * | * @param root the structure's root | * @return true if structure has been modified, false otherwise | */ | boolean hasStructureBeenModified(VirtualFile root); | } | All the rest is impl detail. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207594#4207594 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4207594

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Bringing the trunk profile service changes to 5_x

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I took a look at merging the current trunk profile service changes into the Branch_5_x using just the 6.0.0.Alpha3 org.jboss.integration:jboss-profileservice-spi, but I see it has dependencies on updated deployer classes like org.jboss.deployers.client.plugins.deployment.AbstractDeployment. Are we going to be able to update the deployers and related jars? This is just the system subproject so far. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207566#4207566 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4207566

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: [JBMESSAGING-1367] Create JCA resource adapter for JBM 2

by jesper.pedersen

We are now at the fun part :) I've imported the activation spec + the activation (minus the DLQ stuff for now) into the repository. We now need to hook up the activation with number of sessions that handles the message processing. Since we can't use the ServerSessionPool / ServerSession for this we need to do it another way. We have the maximum number of sessions allowed from the activation spec - and we are currently using the JMS 1.1 API as the interface to the core. This basically means that we can only count on the receive() methods. But that lead us to the problem that we need to poll to see if there is a message to process :S So are there any internal API that would be better - or is there some JMS magic we can use ? We can use all the JBM classes as this is a specific RA... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207490#4207490 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4207490

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Generated Classes not found if they do not match any of

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAOP-698 AOP not generates proxies that previously would go in the default package in "org.jboss.aop.generatedproxies". Proxies for classes in user packages still go into that package. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207454#4207454 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4207454

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: The DeploymentManager and ProfileService

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"emuckenhuber" wrote : | Hmm inmemory deployment - so that you don't need to create a physical jar? | Wouldn't that then be just another Profile implementation which actually creates the deployments? | Yes, that is what I'm trying out. Right now I'm looking to see if I can just use the existing ProfileMetaData with an vfsmemory://xxx url. I need a new ProfileFactory to handle this, and support for multiple ProfileFactorys. "emuckenhuber" wrote : | I guess @Profile would be similar to the sub-profile in xml then - where you basically | just choose a required profile for the unit test? | Yes, I'll probably change that to @ProfileRef to avoid name clashes with the Profile interface. The @Profiles are showing up as the subprofiles in the ProfileMetaData. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207448#4207448 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4207448

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2009