March 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: AS 5 not reliably picking up changes in exploded EAR

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

"max.andersen(a)jboss.com" wrote : I still don't understand why Seam needs to have a tmp for exploded deployment ? It's a workaround for another problem in JBoss 5 (which I don't quite understand)... Really, it looks to me like all realworld apps will have this problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216215#4216215 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216215

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Dependency on XB DefaultSchemaResolver

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

Thanks. I've added my 2 cents though in the form of renaming JBossXBDeployerHelper to JBossXBHelper and moving it to org.jboss.xb.util. I've rebuilt XB snapshot, uploaded it to the snapshot repositories and also updated deployers under JBDEPLOY-173. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216210#4216210 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216210

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: jta/jts jar/config file change

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Unix diff is your friend. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216200#4216200 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216200

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: AS 5 not reliably picking up changes in exploded EAR

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

I still don't understand why Seam needs to have a tmp for exploded deployment ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216172#4216172 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216172

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: AS 5 not reliably picking up changes in exploded EAR

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

but apparently it is - maybe something specific for facelets ? i.e. if jboss web says it is should look at the tmp/ dir instead of the actual deployed dir and changes to .xhtml is not being copied over ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216165#4216165 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216165

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: JBossWS Test Approach

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

"alessio.soldano(a)jboss.com" wrote : "richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying there's not a problem and we have an easy life with this way of working ;-) Just trying to evaluate the situation, let's think about alternatives (at least given the current state of the AS). | Don't worry, the nightmare part was a joke ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216164#4216164 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216164

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: AS 5 not reliably picking up changes in exploded EAR

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

I talked to Ales about this, he said that this forcing of a tmp copy shouldn't cause changes not to be seen as the original is still watched for changes and modificationcs copied. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216160#4216160 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216160

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Enhancement to XPathLanguage.dsl

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

The suggestion is good, adding it in the wrong place isn't. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216155#4216155 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216155

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Enhancement to XPathLanguage.dsl

by tfennelly

Nothing like a healthy discussion lol View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216151#4216151 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216151

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: JBossWS Test Approach

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

"richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote : "alessio.soldano(a)jboss.com" wrote : what would you suggest instead of that? I don't like that much the idea of specifying the surefire additionalClasspath with a list of jar from the curent AS... any other idea? | I'm thinking exactly about that ;) But I have to googlize this problem much more. I don't believe we're the first one facing this problem. | OK, let's see if there's a better solution :-) anonymous wrote : "alessio.soldano(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | After all, we also get advantages from using maven dependencies to build test classpath, otherwise we need keep track of jar changes (names, position), addition of jars (while we simply get the new dependency for free when somebody updates the dependency in an artifact we include), etc. | Wrong point of view. I'd maintain all this staff like we did it before JBossWS mavenization and like we do it now (see our binary distribution) and be sure we're using proper jars directly from AS than using current approach which is broken. | | Current approach doesn't save anything. It just makes me sleep really very bad :( | I have a nightmare regularly at nights where I'm debugging for hours/days something and finally solving the problem with conclusion we're using wrong client classpath and hotfixing it with one maven dependencies exclusion in our testsuite pom.xml | Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying there's not a problem and we have an easy life with this way of working ;-) Just trying to evaluate the situation, let's think about alternatives (at least given the current state of the AS). View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4216146#4216146 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4216146

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2009