March 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Incompatible GPD files

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

This is a non-issue. The change is purely internal (i.e. it only affects the gpd.xml file) and is completely backwards compatible as the editor does the check and performs the necessary changes after asking the user. This was included in GPD 3.1.0 beta1 and fixed with https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GPD-64 on June 14th 2007, almost 2 years ago. As Alex points out, the changes he did comprise a number of example process definitions that slipped through the cracks and apparently were not yet converted. Regards, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214488#4214488 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214488

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ByteBuffer.allocateDirect ridiculously slow

by timfox

>From the java.nio.ByteBuffer javadoc (my emphasis added): anonymous wrote : | A direct byte buffer may be created by invoking the allocateDirect factory method of this class. The buffers returned by this method typically have somewhat higher allocation and deallocation costs than non-direct buffers. The contents of direct buffers may reside outside of the normal garbage-collected heap, and so their impact upon the memory footprint of an application might not be obvious. It is therefore recommended that direct buffers be allocated primarily for large, long-lived buffers that are subject to the underlying system's native I/O operations. In general it is best to allocate direct buffers only when they yield a measureable gain in program performance. | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214446#4214446 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214446

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Contributing back to the jBPM community - business calen

by baobab

And 6h, don't post replies after drug. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214438#4214438 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214438

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Wiki] - Re: wiki support portal 2.7 ?

by piergiorgiolucidi

I have finished migration for supporting JBoss Portal 2.7, now I'm checking last things during this days I hope to commit the new tag on source repository. As soon as I'll post news about how to get the new version ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214437#4214437 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214437

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: jbossjts sources

by jhalliday

JBossTS does not use mvn to build, so there is no direct correspondence between source and binary artifacts, particularly for the JTS which does CORBA stub/skeleton generation and such during the build. I can jar up the raw source files and include them if that is sufficient, but I don't really see it having any advantage over pulling the source tree from svn. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214436#4214436 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214436

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ByteBuffer.allocateDirect ridiculously slow

by timfox

It's a well known factor that direct bytebuffer allocation is much slower than non direct byte buffers. If you think about it when you allocate a non direct byte buffer then it basically just needs to dereference a pointer to some memory on the Java heap, which is very quick. But for a direct buffer, it has to malloc real memory from the OS, and do a bunch of other house keeping. So yes, if you're using direct byte buffers it pays to re-use them. You should speak to Trustin about this. I believe Netty uses non direct buffers for exactly this reason. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214413#4214413 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214413

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - processAction not executing

by mitesh1984_agrawal

Hi friends, I have created 1 portlet class and 2 jsp file fil1 and fil2. Fil1 has a submit button and some form fields which when clicked should transfer the data to class jsp file fil2 must be displayed. But when i am submiting the page i found that processAction method in portlet class was not executing and due to this i was not getting desired o/p Can anyone plz help me Thanks in advance View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214410#4214410 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214410

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Incompatible GPD files

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

When did the format change? Are you saying that SOA customers won't be able to use their existing GPD files with 3.2.5.SP2 nor jbpm-3.2.6.GA? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214404#4214404 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214404

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Invalid JSF-Console release

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Alejandro sais, anonymous wrote : | I created a 3.2.6.GA branch for the jsf-console, fixed a broken ejb-ref | in jboss-web.xml and set the version numbers in the poms appropriately. | | I took the console for a test drive with the websale process and it | works just fine. As soon as Hudson completes, it should be ready to fly. | | We did not agree on who would release it. If any of you does it, would | you please document your steps so I can do it in the future? | I verified that this is ok and will recreate the tag from it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214401#4214401 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214401

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: 2 root elements question

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

Don't update the component matrix to use XB 2.0.1Beta2 yet. I am working on some issues I found. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214399#4214399 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214399

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2009