April 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: QueueDeployer?

by timfox

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : I have figured out. | | But I still don't understand is: | | - Why we're not using jbm-jms.xml to deploy the examples? | I agree the example should deploy JMS queues in the normal way -i.e. through the config. I think this is more transparent and less confusing for the user ("how did this queue get deployed?"). anonymous wrote : | - Have we thought about using masks on the deployers, such as jbm-jms*.xml? In a way the user could have its own config files? | I'm not sure what you mean here. But JBM already supports multiple queue files ending in *-queues.xml For each example I suggest it has its own config directory where we can put the queue or other config. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223178#4223178 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223178

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: JBossRetro cannot replace final reference to StringBuild

by chiba

Hi, I understand the .class file after the manipulation has a wrong local variable table but my question is why you think this is a prlbem. Since the local variable table is not used *at all* at runtime, I guess you saw another real problem and decompiled the .class file, and then you found the local variable table contained a wrong entry. Another guess is you are using another tool that refers to the local variable table. In either case, I am happy to fix the bug(?) of Javassist but I would also like to know what is your real problem. Thank you! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223164#4223164 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223164

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Can't build org.jboss.txbridge with Arjuna WST 1.1 classes

by ben.cotton＠rutgers.edu

Hi, I want to build org.jboss.txbridge with the Arjuna WST 1.1 package. I can build org.jboss.txbridge.* just fine with Arjuna's WST 1.0 package (com.arjuna.mw.wst.*), but JBoss 5.0 GA uses Ajuna's WST 1.1 (with no official backward support for Arjuna WST 1.0 ) I've plodded around my ../jboss-5.0.0.GA/ installation dirs at length (includng ../jboss-5.0.0.GA/docs/, etc.) ... and have been been totally unsuccessful finding the exact .jar/.sar that contains the WST 1.1 equivalent of com.arjuna.mw.wst.* . I need a hand ... can somebody please point me to the the exact .jar/.sar in the ../jboss-5.0.0.GA/ tree that gives me the Arjuna WST 1.1 classes? Thanks, Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223145#4223145 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223145

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM 4 Email Question

by bradsdavis

I could see creating a server filter interface. As for attachments, I think we should allow them to extend our Email Producers to add attachments of their choice. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223142#4223142 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223142

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Codesource URL on the embedded jars

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

Scott/Adrian, we had some discussion on this last year. Basically in JBAS4.x, the codesource url is set to the top level deployment. As part of the VFS layer, we wanted the ability to set the CS at individual jars level. http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=152913 Any thoughts/comments? We have a potential community contribution for JBAS4.2.x. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223141#4223141 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223141

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM 4 Email Question

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

Another topic is identity integration for resolving email addresses for actors. Tom, how far did you go towards incorporating the JBoss identity solution? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223139#4223139 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223139

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM 4 Email Question

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

To choose a server, would the domain be the only relevant selection criterion? In the pluggability spirit, we could have a MailServerFilter interface that took an Email and returned whether it can send the email or not. Then we provide a MailServerFilter implementation that filters based on domains. For email attachments, what data sources are we interested in? One obvious source is process variables. URLs, database LOBs come to mind as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223138#4223138 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223138

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Registering an XSD for use by a SchemaResolverDeployer

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

I wouldn't say it's a similar issue. It depends on what you want to do but SingletonSchemaResolverFactory may not be a good choice for this feature. It's singleton, so it's one for all. While, theoretically, different JARs may use different classes for the same namespace. In this case, component-specific configuration shouldn't modify global configuration. Instead, there should be a JAR-specific SchemaBindingResolver which would delegate to the SingletonSchemaResolverFactory (or whatever the global resolver is) in case it can't resolve the binding by itself. If bindings from different JARs don't and can't contradict each other then no problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223134#4223134 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223134

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM 4 Email Question

by bradsdavis

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Removing ClassLoading from jboss-bootstrap

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"ALRubinger" wrote : | * Removal of NoAnnotationCL - a URLCL which is commented to be used in RMI. Is this still the case? | This should no longer be useful as we should be using remoting for transport everywhere now. "ALRubinger" wrote : | * AbstractServerImpl.start() to use the TCCL. Currently it's using 2 different CLs (one for starting the ServerImpl, one for the bootstraps). | Don't know about that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4223121#4223121 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4223121

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2009