May 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: OnDemand as an aspect

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

Perhaps a more sane solution is to have a lazy servlet initialization function in JBossWeb. I don't think this is a "healthy" general-purpose solution, because the patterns it encourages are almost never desirable. For example, you only describe using it as a workaround for another problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228777#4228777 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228777

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: REST integration within JBoss ESB

by burrsutter

In my way of thinking, "REST support" can have at least two different implementations. a) Great support for HTTP: - synchronous request/reply - important verbs (e.g. GET, PUT, POST, DELETE) - access to the entire URI & query string, ease of access in an action to the URI, in some cases to make routing decisions - ability to change the content-type of the response - ability to return declared HTTP response codes - multiple services per port - support for reading and setting the HTTP headers in an action - support for marshalling the response data as XML or JSON, based on the HTTP Accept header Examples: GET http://localhost:8080/orders/10 - fetch me order id 10 PUT http://locahost:8080/orders/10 - insert with order id 10 POST http://locahost:8080/orders - insert order, return a Status 201 Created Location: http://localhost:8080/orders/1235 GET http://localhost:8080/orders/10/orderlines - fetch me the order line-items from order id 10 b) Inclusion of and support for a JAX-RS implementation like RESTEasy. This could work like the older 181 annotated JAX-WS endpoint with SOAPProcessor action. I'm not sure how to map it to the EBWS feature. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228770#4228770 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228770

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: User documentation for 2.0.0.beta1

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

In my opinion we should keep whatever you want during the creation phase.. and after it's ready we should convert it to Docbook. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228769#4228769 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228769

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: iCal Task Management Client prototype

by jbarrez

Testing your taskcal component is something thats high on my to-do list. After the community day, I'm going to give it a spin and give you some feedback. I think that having the tasks in a folder can be a nice feature (altough I don't know about the 'real' use case). Ofc, if it's easily done, why not ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228768#4228768 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228768

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Installer docs

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

developer documentation fully updated here: http://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-12867 let me know if there is something else that you need. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228765#4228765 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228765

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: iCal Task Management Client prototype

by aapthorp

Is there any interest / value in making jBPM tasks or process definitions visible / accessible via WebDav? With a simple change I found that I can list tasks (as .ics) in Windows XP Web Folders. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228764#4228764 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228764

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: User documentation for 2.0.0.beta1

by jmesnil

"timfox" wrote : What about ODF and PDF? OpenOffice saves ODF documents in a zip file, so we won't be able to resolve conflicts. Ditto for PDF (it is a binary format) If we got the OOo way, the best approach would be to save in ODF (that's the best format for OOo), make sure we communicate on document changes to avoid svn conflicts. And we'd have to generate the HTML and PDF documents manually when doing a release. Is that ok for everybody? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228761#4228761 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228761

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: jboss profiler 2.0.beta3 config

by jesper.pedersen

You need to include | -javaagent:jboss-profiler.jar -Djboss-profiler.properties=jboss-profiler.properties | The documentation in SVN has been converted to Docbook - and PDFs will be provided in future releases. Feel free to submit changes for the documentation through our JIRA installation. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228750#4228750 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228750

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - jboss profiler 2.0.beta3 config

by bwarren

>From the README: "* Edit run.conf (Unix) or run.bat (Windows) in jbossas/bin to include JBoss Profiler in JAVA_OPTS" Include what? I am not able to find this in the docs. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228749#4228749 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228749

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: XPath and regexp routing

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

One implementation option for XPath could be the SXC project on codehaus. It only supports a subset of XPath but could be sufficient for some needs. Of course there is no reason why SXC would have to be the only implementation option :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228745#4228745 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228745

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2009