May 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Scoped deployments in AS 5.x

by beve

anonymous wrote : Use the AS mechanisms as much as possible for now and we will see where we end up. If we do need to introduce ESB specific mechanisms then we can look into it at a later stage. Yeah, that sounds like a plan. And we have Emanuels links there if we need them later. /Daniel View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228603#4228603 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228603

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Scoped deployments in AS 5.x

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

My preference would be to stick with the AS mechanism rather than to continue the deployment specific configuration, at least until we have a good reason why we need to intervene. This was a necessary evil within AS 4 but should no longer be required using microcontainer. Moving from AS 4 to AS 5 will be a big enough change in any case, differences will arise. We do have plenty of time to revisit this should it become necessary but the main advantage to us of not supporting it would be consistency with other deployments within the microcontainer (configuration and behaviour), and of course it would be someone else's code :) Use the AS mechanisms as much as possible for now and we will see where we end up. If we do need to introduce ESB specific mechanisms then we can look into it at a later stage. Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228601#4228601 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228601

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Caching of classes in BaseClassLoaderDomain

by adrian＠jboss.org

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | I'll fix it properly, but it is slightly complicated in that step (2) isn't the | correct thing to do if the class doesn't match the parent filter. Actually, I think there's an issue with doing that, in that the parent cache could get flushed due to a new deployment in that domain while the child blacklist is not. I need to think about the way this works to make it more efficient. But I don't think the blacklist optimaztion is as important as the caching so I'll fix the use in BaseClassLoaderDomain.loadClass() and do a release of 2.0.6 I'll have to come up with a more optimal solution for 2.0.7 :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228600#4228600 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228600

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: AIO Buffer & Executors Optimization Update

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : PerfSender and PerfListener used the old example framework so could not work as is with the new one. | | You could port them to the new framework. I had this as a todo. Typically the examples start the server as part of the examples. For this i was going to have a separate target since the producers/consumers can be started in different orders. so something like, | ant runServer; | ant runConsumer; | ant runProducer; | Clebert, feel free to port them. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228585#4228585 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228585

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: User documentation for 2.0.0.beta1

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : 1) I don't want to be editing XML directly, this just gets in the way of the flow of authoring and makes it a PITA +1 anonymous wrote : 2) Documents need to be mergeable so multiple people can work on them at the same time without having merge nightmares. | | I have never found a good wysiwyg editor for docbook. (I tried and failed to find one). | | I suggest we author in, say, open office, and save as either a) pdf b) docbook c) odf which are all xml formats and hence mergeable. | | wdyt? Open office and save in docbook for me! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228584#4228584 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228584

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: JBoss Profiler Installation in Windows - questions

by krashsun

Hi, After some try and error I have managed to run the command as below java -jar jboss-profiler-client.jar -h 0.0.0.0 -p 5400 listSnapshots Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228579#4228579 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228579

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: User documentation for 2.0.0.beta1

by timfox

For me there are two main criteria: 1) I don't want to be editing XML directly, this just gets in the way of the flow of authoring and makes it a PITA 2) Documents need to be mergeable so multiple people can work on them at the same time without having merge nightmares. I have never found a good wysiwyg editor for docbook. (I tried and failed to find one). I suggest we author in, say, open office, and save as either a) pdf b) docbook c) odf which are all xml formats and hence mergeable. wdyt? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228570#4228570 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228570

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: AIO Buffer & Executors Optimization Update

by timfox

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : BTW: What happened to perfSender and perfListener? | | We were using those to measure the release on Alpha. I was using those to measure AIO. PerfSender and PerfListener used the old example framework so could not work as is with the new one. You could port them to the new framework. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228569#4228569 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228569

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Caching of classes in BaseClassLoaderDomain

by adrian＠jboss.org

Well, turning the blacklist off altogether is one way to fix it. :-) But it is inconsistent. If you had three levels of hierarchical domain it still wouldn't work because loadClass(...) still checks the blacklist. The issue is that the blacklist is being checked before the parent (cache) is asked wether it knows the class. The order should be more like: 1) Check the current domain to see if cached == false 2) Check the parent domain to see if cached == true 3) Check the current domain to see if blacklisted == true Currently (2) and (3) are the wrong way around. Your fix just removes (3) In fact, the real issue is that (2) is not happening at all except inside the classloader lock which is not very efficient. I'll fix it properly, but it is slightly complicated in that step (2) isn't the correct thing to do if the class doesn't match the parent filter. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228564#4228564 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228564

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Other JBoss Development Design] - Re: JBAS-6390, JBNAME-25, IPv6 support

by dpospisi＠redhat.com

Still, it is not clear to me how to get the testsuite running with an IPV6 address. Even if I specify JNDI url using @ syntax (node0.jndi.url=jnp://::1@1099) lots of test cases are just ignoring this property and assuming jnp://$HOST:$PORT syntax. As far as I understand, it would be required to: a) add support for standard IPV6 url in form: jnp://[$IPV6_ADDR]:$PORT b) fix those test cases Thanks, Dominik View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4228552#4228552 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4228552

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2009