June 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB 2.1 Beans in jbpm 4?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

in fact, i think the command service should be removed from the api module and be moved to the internal classes. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236793#4236793 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236793

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB 2.1 Beans in jbpm 4?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

bernd, you should not use the remote command service directly. instead, you use the other jbpm services. internally they delegate to the command service. (which can be an ejb2 remote command service) so even in the ejb remote case, you should not be confronted with ejb 2 details. so i don't see the problem yet. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236792#4236792 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236792

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: DeclaredMethodSignature for annotation handling

by alesj

"jaikiran" wrote : I don't see a option for marking it as fixed for 2.0.2 (off Branch_2_0) in JIRA. So no more releases from that branch? | Just set it as the last version/release. I'll then move appropriately. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236779#4236779 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236779

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Dealing with variable operation return types

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Related to JBAS-6242, a general problem for the jon usage of managed objects is that they need more information about operation return types when they are opaque types like Object mapping to anything from a GenericValue to a String. For operations that do have a fixed type the return type should be mapped to that. For operations that can change based on other settings as is the case for the JBAS-6242, I guess we have to impose a fixed type that a MetaMapper will have to handle producing based on the possible return types. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236776#4236776 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236776

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: DeclaredMethodSignature for annotation handling

by jaikiran

I don't see a option for marking it as fixed for 2.0.2 (off Branch_2_0) in JIRA. So no more releases from that branch? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236773#4236773 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236773

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: DeclaredMethodSignature for annotation handling

by jaikiran

"alesj" wrote : | In this case it looks like it's just an impl detail, hence change/fix them both. Yep, it's just a impl change. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236767#4236767 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236767

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: DeclaredMethodSignature for annotation handling

by alesj

"jaikiran" wrote : | Should this change go in Branch_2_0 of jboss-mdr or trunk or both? | It depends. If it breaks API, then only trunk, else both. In this case it looks like it's just an impl detail, hence change/fix them both. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236763#4236763 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236763

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Journal pauses when creating new files

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Nothing changed on this regard. Writes are aways sent on executors.. (On AIO, the main thread never block on a write, unless it is waiting for a sync callback). There is aways a file opened, and another file is immediately created when that file is returned. Perhaps, the only thing that changed was... we can get better throughput on the disk. If your disk is maxed out (your laptop for instance) the file creation may be competing with the journal write process. If the disk throughput is maxed out, the time to create a new file may be higher than the ammount of time needed to fill up a file, on that case we will have eventual pauses waiting for new files to be opened. I aways have seen this happening before.. and I've done a lot of testing around this. But I will take a look, see if we can improve anything on the process of files-creation. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236754#4236754 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236754

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB 2.1 Beans in jbpm 4?

by jbarrez

I agree, the initialContext should be cached I thought the discussion of ejb2 vs ejb3 was done in the past and I think that tom wanted to have support on as many application servers as possible. Altough I must agree that I like EJB3 much much more ;) anonymous wrote : In combination with the command interface in jBPM 3.0 not being really supported/documented and thus probably not being used much Everywhere I've done jbpm consultancy, they are using the CommandService ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236753#4236753 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236753

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: DeclaredMethodSignature for annotation handling

by jaikiran

"jaikiran" wrote : | https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMDR-56 Should this change go in Branch_2_0 of jboss-mdr or trunk or both? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236748#4236748 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236748

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2009