June 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: A possible leak in management and failover tests

by timfox

Your dump just shows a connection holdings references to channels which is completely normal. What we need to know is what has the reference to the remoting connection. Also "somewhere on management has a reference to resource manager", well yes, the ManagementService has a reference to messaging server control which has a reference to resource manager, that's normal. But it doesn't help, what we need to know is what has the reference to the ManagementService and why it's not being cleared. "Remoting has a reference to management". Really? I can't find any such reference in the code. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236910#4236910 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236910

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: A possible leak in management and failover tests

by timfox

This is all a bit vague - I'm not sure there's enough information here for us to understand/do anything about this right now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236909#4236909 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236909

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Multi-threaded replication

by timfox

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : | don't forget about paging. Paging will add a bunch of messages to the queue, and that happens outside of the context of sending. Right now the server only allow us to control this at Session level. We need to ensure some control at Queue level also, somehow. | | | I mentioned paging in the first post. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236908#4236908 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236908

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC tools

by alesj

I would also handle different metadata classes/values differently, more OO. As it would be much easier to extend (and support) in the future. Every excessive "if" usage usually indicates lack of OO. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236907#4236907 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236907

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC tools

by alesj

Looking at the JBossBeanXMLMarshaller::marshal. | else if(value instanceof BeanMetaData) | { | BeanMetaData anonymousBean = (BeanMetaData) value; | I guess a recursions could be used here? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236899#4236899 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236899

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Journal Cleanup and Journal Compactor

by timfox

Can you explain a bit more? I'm not really sure what you're proposing based on this explanation. I _hope_ you're not proposing we write a database! ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236898#4236898 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236898

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: IdentityService API Usage update

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

perfect. go ahead. thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236897#4236897 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236897

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - IdentityService API Usage update

by jeff.yuchang

Hi all, Noted from the test cases code, we all use the groupName as groupId by default, this is fine with the jbpm-built-in implementation, as these two are the same, but they are different in the jboss idm implementation. So I am going to update those test cases, using the groupId, instead of groupName, take org.jbpm.examples.mail.inline.InlineMailTest.java for example: | identityService.createGroup("thinkpol"); | identityService.createGroup("innerparty"); | identityService.createMembership("obrien", "thinkpol"); | identityService.createMembership("charr", "innerparty"); | identityService.createMembership("obrien", "innerparty"); | I will updated it as: | String groupId1 = identityService.createGroup("thinkpol"); | String groupId2 = identityService.createGroup("innerparty"); | identityService.createMembership("obrien", groupId2); | identityService.createMembership("charr", groupId1); | identityService.createMembership("obrien", groupId1); | Any comments on this update? any objections?? Thanks Jeff View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236891#4236891 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236891

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Cleaning up Logging

by jaikiran

anonymous wrote : 12:53:39,374 WARN [StatelessBeanContext] EJBTHREE-1337: do not get WebServiceContext property from stateless bean context, it should already have been injected Being tracked here https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1847 anonymous wrote : 12:53:39,382 WARN [InterceptorsFactory] EJBTHREE-1246: Do not use InterceptorsFactory with a ManagedObjectAdvisor, InterceptorRegistry should be used via the bean container Already done (i just need to commit it today) http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=156567 And no objections from me for the other changes, although i remember Carlo had wanted the Ejb3DependenciesDeployer to be at INFO level. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236890#4236890 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236890

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: WebServiceContext proxy

by jaikiran

anonymous wrote : when are you guys either suppress this warning or fix it once and forever. Thanks for reminding me about this. Here's the issue for tracking this https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1847 anonymous wrote : Also, is there an ETA for this "fix"? Since we have a frequent release cycle http://www.jboss.org/ejb3.html you should be able to get this fix soon. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236887#4236887 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236887

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2009