August 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Datasources not parsing jboss.server.data.dir

by Smin3r

I have the same problem with e.g. datasource name. Any solutions? thanks all View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248113#4248113 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248113

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Http Gateway - requirements please...

by tfennelly

OK... so I think I eventually got it generating the security bits. Was a bit of pita :) It looks slightly different from above, but amounts to the same thing. So the http-provider definition (inside the jboss-esb.xml) is now looking like.... | <http-provider name="http"> | <http-bus busid="ordermgt" /> | | <http-bus busid="sales"> | <allowed-roles> | <role name="friend" /> | </allowed-roles> | <protected-methods> | <method name="GET" /> | </protected-methods> | </http-bus> | | <auth method="BASIC" domain="java:/jaas/AcmeSecProvider" /> | </http-provider> | How the roles and methods are currently working can be summed up as follows... | Methods Specified | Roles Specified | Login Required | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | No | No | No | No | Yes | For All Methods | Yes | Yes | For Specified Methods | Yes | No | No - Specified Methods blocked to all | I think this is right, yeah? Note how the security domain can be configured on the auth element. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248109#4248109 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248109

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ack problem casued by consumer window size

by ataylor

actually it should be | client permits used server receive bytes | client aquires 53 available 100 53 0 | server receives packet size 53 53 53 | client aquires 25 available 47 78 53 | client aquires 13 available 22 91 53 | server receives packet size 25 91 78 | server frees 78 bytes 13 0 | server receives packetsize 13 13 13 | client aquires 30 available 87 43 13 | client aquires 30 available 57 73 13 | client aquires 30 available 27 (waits) 73 13 | server receives packet size 30 73 43 | server receives packet size 30 73 73 | hang View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248075#4248075 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248075

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - ack problem casued by consumer window size

by ataylor

This is to do with https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-1693. If i set the producer window size to 100 and the ack batch size to -1 the consumer will hang after a couple of messages. In this scenario the send semaphore has 100 and the confirm window size will be 75 (i.e. 100 *.75). I logged the acquiring of send semaphores and you can see how it hangs as follows client permits used server receive bytes | client aquires 53 available 100 53 0 | server receives packet size 53 53 53 | client aquires 25 available 47 78 53 | client aquires 13 available 22 91 53 | server receives packet size 25 91 78 | server frees 78 bytes 13 0 | server receives packetsize 13 13 13 | client aquires 30 available 87 43 13 | client aquires 30 available 57 73 13 | client aquires 30 available 27 (waits) 73 13 | server receives packet size 13 73 43 | server receives packet size 13 73 73 | hang If i change the confirm window size to 70 % (i.e. 100 * .7) then it works fine. Thing is i'm struggling with the maths here of what the confirm window size should be in order to always work. any ideas anyone. We could make this configurable? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248073#4248073 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248073

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Profile] - porno tube clips completed

by Karweens

porno tube clips free !!!! Download at will!!!!! http://mitglied.lycos.de/girlbody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/znakomstva-dlja-seksa-v-rjazane.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/olenin-znakomstva.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/intim-znakomstva-v-rizani.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/udalitb-profajl-na-sajte-znakomstva.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/znakomstva-12let-iwu-parnja..html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/znakomstvo-dlja-seks-otdyha.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/znakomstva-turcija-antalija.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/hhh-znakomstva-hhh-znakomstva.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/peretrah.ru-sajt-znakomstv.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/katalog-zhurnalov-znakomstv-dlja-inost... http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/seks-znakomstva-v-tvoem-gorode.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/znakomstva-belorussija-vitebsk.html http://mitglied.lycos.de/vseznakomstva http://znakomstvasex.freewebhostx.com http://vseznakomstva.freewhost.com http://znakomstvadlya.freehostia.com View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248029#4248029 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248029

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Profile] - porno tube clips ordinary

by Karweens

porno tube clips free !!!! Download free!!!!! http://mitglied.lycos.de/girlbody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/znakomstva-dlja-seksa-v-rjazane.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/olenin-znakomstva.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/intim-znakomstva-v-rizani.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/udalitb-profajl-na-sajte-znakomstva.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/znakomstva-12let-iwu-parnja..html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/znakomstvo-dlja-seks-otdyha.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/znakomstva-turcija-antalija.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/hhh-znakomstva-hhh-znakomstva.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/peretrah.ru-sajt-znakomstv.html http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/katalog-zhurnalov-znakomstv-dlja-inost... http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/seks-znakomstva-v-tvoem-gorode.html [url=http://znakomstva-s.freehostia.com/znakomstva-belorussija-vitebsk.htm... gallery[/url] View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4248028#4248028 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4248028

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] How to implement uncontrolled sequence flow beha

by kukeltje

"tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com" wrote : (ps you already might have noticed that in our own implementations, it is best to use the impl classes and not the interfaces) I have recently and it is becoming a problem. The PVM is created with jPDL as a reference/base. BPMN is a little different in some cases. I've implemented several workarounds now but that does not feel good. An example: While parsing the transitions and adding them to the activities, I'd like to set the defaultOutGoingTransition on the activity. I cannot do that, since the findActivity in the CompositeElementImpl returns an ActivityImpl but I need the ExclusiveGateway since that is the only one that has the getDefault() on it (which outgoing transition is the default is on the exclusive gateway, not the transition). If this was possible the parsing of the outgoing transitions would be cleaner as it currently is. Any chance that this can be changed? Or otherwise please enlighten me why this is not an option. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4247990#4247990 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4247990

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] How to implement uncontrolled sequence flow beha

by kukeltje

In gateways it is called from the execute. For the externalActivities it is or better will be called from the signal in the activity(experimenting with that locally). Have to do some refactoring/simplification of the leave. It is now to big a method for different types of nodes. I think it will work eventually. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4247975#4247975 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4247975

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [BPMN2] How to implement uncontrolled sequence flow beha

by camunda

But currently you call the leave from the Task.execute, right? But for not ExternalActivities, the execute shouldn't block, so the "execution.proceed" is called by the PVM, or not? So the leave doesn't get called correctly for a non ExternalActivity. It should be called by the PVM itself, or not? So what Tom mentioned, the processd shouldn't be implemented in the PVM but delegated to the Activity. But if the tests are running the green bar maybe supports your solution ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4247973#4247973 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4247973

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: interested in contributing ?

by camunda

Okay. But i expect it to be very different in 4 ;-) At least much easier... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4247944#4247944 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4247944

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums August 2009