September 2009 - jboss-dev-forums

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] - m2eclipse or not

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, I'm wondering if there is a convention on whether MC projects should use http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/ or not. I personally prefer m2eclipse over other (less dynamic) classpath config mechanisms like this | <classpath> | <classpathentry kind="src" path="src/test/java" output="target/tests-classes" including="**/*.java"/> | <classpathentry kind="src" path="src/test/resources" output="target/tests-classes" excluding="**/*.java"/> | <classpathentry kind="src" path="src/main/java" including="**/*.java"/> | <classpathentry kind="output" path="target/classes"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/org/apache/ant/ant/1.7.0/ant-1.7.0.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/org/apache/ant/ant-junit/1.7.0/ant-junit-1.7.0.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/org/apache/ant/ant-launcher/1.7.0/ant-launcher-1.7.0.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/javassist/javassist/3.10.0.GA/javassist-3.10.0.GA.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/org/jboss/integration/jboss-classloading-spi/5.1.0.SP1/jboss-classloading-spi-5.1.0.SP1.jar" sourcepath="M2_REPO/org/jboss/integration/jboss-classloading-spi/5.1.0.SP1/jboss-classloading-spi-5.1.0.SP1-sources.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/org/jboss/jboss-common-core/2.2.14.GA/jboss-common-core-2.2.14.GA.jar" sourcepath="M2_REPO/org/jboss/jboss-common-core/2.2.14.GA/jboss-common-core-2.2.14.GA-sources.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/org/jboss/logging/jboss-logging-log4j/2.0.5.GA/jboss-logging-log4j-2.0.5.GA.jar" sourcepath="M2_REPO/org/jboss/logging/jboss-logging-log4j/2.0.5.GA/jboss-logging-log4j-2.0.5.GA-sources.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/org/jboss/logging/jboss-logging-spi/2.0.5.GA/jboss-logging-spi-2.0.5.GA.jar" sourcepath="M2_REPO/org/jboss/logging/jboss-logging-spi/2.0.5.GA/jboss-logging-spi-2.0.5.GA-sources.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/jboss/profiler/jvmti/jboss-profiler-jvmti/1.0.0.CR5/jboss-profiler-jvmti-1.0.0.CR5.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/org/jboss/jbossas/jboss-server-manager/0.1.1.GA/jboss-server-manager-0.1.1.GA.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/org/jboss/test/jboss-test/1.1.1.GA/jboss-test-1.1.1.GA.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/junit/junit/4.4/junit-4.4.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="var" path="M2_REPO/apache-log4j/log4j/1.2.14/log4j-1.2.14.jar"/> | <classpathentry kind="con" path="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.JRE_CONTAINER/org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.ui.launcher.StandardVMType/J2SE-1.5"/> | </classpath> | Any objections if I switch the classloader projects over? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255524#4255524 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255524

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0 Development] - Re: HornetQ JCA Adapter question

by jaikiran

"ataylor" wrote : | | The issue here is that the TCCL does not get set | | The question i was asking is 'is this a bug' and if so, is there a jira and is it due to be fixed. If my understanding is right, this is the same issue as https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1876 http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=159011 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255515#4255515 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255515

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - Re: consuming webservices

by kukeltje

With "consuming webservices" I assumed invoking jBPM services as a webservice, cause that was mostly what people meant when they pose this question. That could be done with rest. Consuming non-jbpm webservices is indeed not related at all. I agree that JBossWS or JBoss ESB are better ways then. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255510#4255510 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255510

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] - Re: Potential deadlock in ClassLoaderManager

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Ok, I'll have a look View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255507#4255507 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255507

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Re: Exploding jar libraries in deployments

by alesj

Looking at the issue more closely, I don't think handling of vfs-memory via some copy mechanism would actually help here. As it would be the tld handling that wouldn't work then - as shown in our initial exception. tld handling currently explicitly expects zip file, where in our case we wouldn't know how to generically create one out from vfs-memory contents. Only proper solution, and that's what Remy is currently working on, is to have tld handling ported (back) to VFS. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255506#4255506 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255506

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - Re: consuming webservices

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

He wants to "consume webservices in JBPM". that's not related to the Rest interfaces at all. @django83 take a look at jaxws clients: http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/JBossWS View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255505#4255505 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255505

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0 Development] - Re: HornetQ JCA Adapter question

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : In both options its the end-point proxy that controls the transaction -- see Figure 12-7 in JCA 1.5. The end-point could be a MDB Ok, regarding how we control transactions we do it no different from the AS implementation. We basically start the tx before delivery and rollback/commit depending on the outcome. The reason we removed before/afterdelivery is because we shouldn't need to call it as we are starting the tx before the delivery. The issue here is that the TCCL does not get set, looking at the AS code it looks like when the TraditionalXATransactionDemarcationStrategy is used, i.e. https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-7084 the same problem will occur. Jesper, you should check this. I can change the code back to option B and call before/afterdelivery to fix this but this introduces an extra overhead but its no biggie. The question i was asking is 'is this a bug' and if so, is there a jira and is it due to be fixed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255489#4255489 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255489

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - Re: Change caching strategy from nonstrict-read-write to tra

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"the_olo" wrote : So I suppose, when (if) jBPM-BPEL makes the move to jBPM 4, the clustering and caching issue will be fundamentally solved? | yes "the_olo" wrote : Are you aware what are the plans (a roadmap perhaps) for jBPM-BPEL? Is there active development going on in that direction? there was an initiative at Bull. but i'm not sure if they are still actively working on that. if we ever revive BPEL on jBPM, that is a good starting point. but in the near future, we won't have time to look into that. that will probably be mid-to-long term. in the meantime, the jboss products will include riftsaw (based on apache ode) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255480#4255480 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255480

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] - Re: Change caching strategy from nonstrict-read-write to tra

by the_olo

So I suppose, when (if) jBPM-BPEL makes the move to jBPM 4, the clustering and caching issue will be fundamentally solved? Are you aware what are the plans (a roadmap perhaps) for jBPM-BPEL? Is there active development going on in that direction? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255474#4255474 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255474

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AS Development Web Profile] - Re: JBoss Web Stand-alone

by wolfc

Spider can be found here: http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/spider/trunk/. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4255469#4255469 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4255469

17 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2009