January 2010 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss AS Development Deployment Framework] New message: "Re: JavaEE namespace deployers"

by Scott Stark

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "JavaEE namespace deployers": http://community.jboss.org/message/519682#519682 Author : Scott Stark Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/scott.stark@jboss.org Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- The JNDIView bean needs a massive overhaul to properly display all of the namespaces. I would like to completely move away from class loader based component namespaces. I believe an spi is needed in the naming project that the ENCFactory implements to provide read-only access to all current components for use by admin views like JNDIView. At least this issue is related: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6001 I created https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBNAME-44 to introduce the spi into naming. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519682#519682

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Re: MutableAttachments.addAttachment is counter-intuitive"

by Scott Stark

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "MutableAttachments.addAttachment is counter-intuitive": http://community.jboss.org/message/519676#519676 Author : Scott Stark Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/scott.stark@jboss.org Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- putX is what makes more sense because that is what is actually happening. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519676#519676

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AOP Development] New message: "Re: ClassPool Refactoring"

by Kabir Khan

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "ClassPool Refactoring": http://community.jboss.org/message/519571#519571 Author : Kabir Khan Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kabir.khan@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > mailto:kabir.khan@jboss.com wrote: > There is a cache by default at the moment. I'll turn it off, and have the tests run with and without caching Done -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519571#519571

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Build System Development] New message: "Re: JBEE-15 - Break all EE apis into separately versioned subprojects"

by Steve Ebersole

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "JBEE-15 - Break all EE apis into separately versioned subprojects": http://community.jboss.org/message/519543#519543 Author : Steve Ebersole Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/steve.ebersole@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I just wanted to point out the need (for Hibernate's needs anyway) to at least have this available targeting JDK 1.4. Someone on IRC (David Llyod perhaps) mentioned that the 1.6 runtime was able to load classes faster if they are compiled targetting 1.6 and suggested compiling for all the JDKs. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519543#519543

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "MutableAttachments.addAttachment is counter-intuitive"

by Carlo de Wolf

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "MutableAttachments.addAttachment is counter-intuitive": http://community.jboss.org/message/519537#519537 Author : Carlo de Wolf Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/wolfc Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- The MutableAttachments API defines a lot of addAttachment functions, which should actually be named setAttachment. Because I'm not adding (another) attachment named <name>, but overriding any previous attachment named <name> with a new one. Alternatively it could be called putAttachment (in line with the Map API). -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519537#519537

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Re: Deployer ordering issue for EJB/JAX-RS/WAR?"

by Carlo de Wolf

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Deployer ordering issue for EJB/JAX-RS/WAR?": http://community.jboss.org/message/519532#519532 Author : Carlo de Wolf Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/wolfc Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hehe, this touches exactly my misunderstand of ComponentDeployers. I use them to split meta data, instead of installing runtime components. Still we should have some sort of composition mechanism on a meta data level. But that would probably be sub-deployments? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519532#519532

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AOP Development] New message: "Re: ClassPool Refactoring"

by Kabir Khan

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "ClassPool Refactoring": http://community.jboss.org/message/519528#519528 Author : Kabir Khan Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kabir.khan@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > alesj wrote: > > > > but this and the CachePolicy class is overridable with system properties http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-classpool/trunk/cla... > By default there should be no cache. Is this the case or not? There is a cache by default at the moment. I'll turn it off, and have the tests run with and without caching -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519528#519528

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AOP Development] New message: "Re: ClassPool Refactoring"

by Ales Justin

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "ClassPool Refactoring": http://community.jboss.org/message/519524#519524 Author : Ales Justin Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/alesj Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > but this and the CachePolicy class is overridable with system properties http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-classpool/trunk/cla... By default there should be no cache. Is this the case or not? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519524#519524

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AOP Development] New message: "Re: ClassPool Refactoring"

by Kabir Khan

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "ClassPool Refactoring": http://community.jboss.org/message/519496#519496 Author : Kabir Khan Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kabir.khan@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Forgot to mention that I scheduled JBREFLECT-92 for a future release since alpha1 is released and alpha2 will probably be a rename of the beta? In other words I did not schedule it against the beta so it would erroneously get included in alpha2 somehow. Once JIRA is updated for the release, this issue should be moved to the right one -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519496#519496

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss AOP Development] New message: "Re: ClassPool Refactoring"

by Kabir Khan

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "ClassPool Refactoring": http://community.jboss.org/message/519495#519495 Author : Kabir Khan Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kabir.khan@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- This has been done against https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREFLECT-92. By default the cache is alive for 20 seconds with a 3 second "resolution", but this and the CachePolicy class is overridable with system properties http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-classpool/trunk/cla... -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519495#519495

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2010