February 2010 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss AOP Development] New message: "Re: Help: Error [Instrumentor] AOP Instrumentor failed"

by dfsdf asdas

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Help: Error [Instrumentor] AOP Instrumentor failed": http://community.jboss.org/message/525052#525052 Author : dfsdf asdas Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/cuccu83 Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I'll try to isolate .aop from .war setting <loader-repository>my.package:loader=unique-ID</loader-repository> but i obtain however ClassCastException...any idea? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/525052#525052

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Tomcat Integration Development] New message: "Re: Deployment of on-demand web applications"

by Emanuel Muckenhuber

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Deployment of on-demand web applications": http://community.jboss.org/message/525048#525048 Author : Emanuel Muckenhuber Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/emuckenhuber Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I was updating some failing profileservice tests, since basically unti the actual web deployment is getting deployed the ManagedObjects are missing. We need to check if we can improve this integration - e.g. that we can expose a "empty" MO in the case of an on-demand web-context. IMHO this is more an AS7 issue though. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/525048#525048

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Profiling the dependency project"

by Kabir Khan

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Profiling the dependency project": http://community.jboss.org/message/525047#525047 Author : Kabir Khan Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kabir.khan@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Since the indexing dependency resolver I have been working on does not yield the performance improvements I was hoping for, I am now benchmarking the dependency project in isolation. It makes profiling a lot easier since there is a lot less other things going on which is the case when starting up the application server. My thinking now is that we should do the same for the other MC modules. One thing is to not try to resolve contexts that are in the INSTALLED state (or where the , from AbstractController.resolveContexts(boolean), this shaves off about 20% for contexts installed in the right order. See http://community.jboss.org/message/524747#524747 for a description of the benchmark. for (ControllerState fromState : stateModel) { ControllerState toState = stateModel.getNextState(fromState); - if (resolveContexts(fromState, toState, trace)) + + if (stateModel.isValidState(toState)) { - resolutions = true; - break; + if (resolveContexts(fromState, toState, trace)) + { + resolutions = true; + break; + } } } } Another simple thing that cuts deploying 2000 contexts -with dependencies in the right order from 852ms->789ms -with dependencies in the right order from 12788ms->8320ms is to further modify resolveContexts to not break out of the loop once it resolves some contexts for a state, e.g. boolean resolutions = true; while (resolutions || onDemandEnabled) { if (onDemandEnabled) wasOnDemandEnabled = true; onDemandEnabled = false; resolutions = false; for (ControllerState fromState : stateModel) { ControllerState toState = stateModel.getNextState(fromState); if (stateModel.isValidState(toState)) { if (resolveContexts(fromState, toState, trace)) { resolutions = true; // break; // Don't exit here } } } } Profiling this for 500 contexts reduces the number of calls to the nested resolveContexts from -17,500 to 7000 (right order) -17,500 to 10,493 (wrong order), a bit down the line we end up with 377K instead of 627K calls to resolveDependencies() All tests pass apart from the ones mentioned in http://community.jboss.org/message/524862#524862 which I know how to fix if Ales agrees: > mailto:kabir.khan@jboss.com wrote: > > I mean this: > > *public* *void* testPlainLifecycleDependencyWrongOrder() *throws* Throwable > { > plainLifecycleDependencyWrongOrder(); > > ControllerContext context2 = assertInstall(1, "Name2", ControllerState.+CONFIGURED+); > ControllerContext context1 = assertInstall(0, "Name1"); > +assertEquals+(ControllerState.+INSTALLED+, context2.getState()); > > SimpleBeanWithLifecycle bean1 = (SimpleBeanWithLifecycle) context1.getTarget(); > +assertNotNull+(bean1); > > SimpleBeanWithLifecycle bean2 = (SimpleBeanWithLifecycle) context2.getTarget(); > +assertNotNull+(bean2); > > +assertEquals+(1, bean1.createOrder); > +assertEquals+(2, bean2.createOrder); > +assertEquals+(3, bean1.startOrder); > +assertEquals+(4, bean2.startOrder); > } > > The new resolver works with > +assertEquals+(1, bean1.createOrder); > +assertEquals+(2, bean1.startOrder); > +assertEquals+(3, bean2.createOrder); > +assertEquals+(4, bean2.startOrder); > > The actual hardcoded orders of beans 1 and 2 is an implemetation detail as I see it. The real check is making sure that the initial install of context 2 does not go beyond CONFIGURED and: > bean1.startOrder > bean1.createOrder > bean2.startOrder > bean2.createOrder > bean2.createOrder > bean1.createOrder > bean2.startOrder > bean1.startOrder > > I've got an infinite loop in the indexing resolver when I start up AS which I need to fix before I can get any measurements of boot time, although it sounds like we won't gain much from this. > -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/525047#525047

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] New message: "timer attribute names"

by Alejandro Guizar

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "timer attribute names": http://community.jboss.org/message/525044#525044 Author : Alejandro Guizar Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/alex.guizar@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I find the attributes of the timer element in jPDL 4 confusing and annoying. In jPDL 3 we already knew that "duedate" was not the most appropriate name for an attribute of type duration, why repeat the same mistake? I'd really like to phase out attribute "duedate" in favor of "delay", preserving backward compatibility, of course. I'd like to have the current "duedatetime" renamed to "duedate" but preserving compatibility would be harder. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/525044#525044

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss ESB Development] New message: "Re: ftp action - how can it be filtered on timestamp?"

by Tom Fennelly

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "ftp action - how can it be filtered on timestamp?": http://community.jboss.org/message/525040#525040 Author : Tom Fennelly Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/tfennelly Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- The read-only FTP listener can be configured with a custom "remoteFileSystemStrategy" class and configuration, allowing you to control the file filtering. See the Programmers Guide. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/525040#525040

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss ESB Development] New message: "ftp action - how can it be filtered on timestamp?"

by venkata ramana

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "ftp action - how can it be filtered on timestamp?": http://community.jboss.org/message/525033#525033 Author : venkata ramana Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/pvrpvrpvr Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- We are having in the properties to monitor files with the given extention for ftp download. Is there any provision to consider only the files after some timestamp. (I want to monitor files created only after 1/1/2010. The site may contain the files dates back to 2009/2008 years <ftp-bus busid="helloFTPChannel" > <ftp-message-filter username="@FTP_USERNAME@" password="@FTP_PASSWORD@" read-only="true" passive="false" directory="@FTP_DIRECTORY@" input-suffix=".dat" work-suffix=".esbWorking" post-delete="false" post-suffix=".COMPLETE" error-delete="false" error-suffix=".HAS_ERROR" /> </ftp-bus> -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/525033#525033

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Web Development] New message: "Jboss BMP problem"

by Shivey Upadhyay

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Jboss BMP problem": http://community.jboss.org/message/525024#525024 Author : Shivey Upadhyay Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/Shivey Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- public interface HelloWorldHome extends javax.ejb.EJBHome{ public void create() throws java.rmi.RemoteException, com.MyException; } --This is a BMP-- public class HelloWorldBean implements EntityBean{ ----implemented methods---- public HelloWorldEntity ejbCreate() throws com.MyException{ throw new MyException("This is explicitly thrown.") } } package com; public class MyException extends RuntimeException{ --custom code to store message goes here-- } Hi, I am trying to run above BMP in JBoss, i want to get the message "This is explicitly thrown." at client, but my exception is not wrapped into Remote exception and the message that i get is like "java.lang.IllegalStateException Cannot obtain isMethod flag for....". Is there any way i can send this specific runtime exception message to client. Thanks in advance. Shivey -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/525024#525024

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0 Development] New message: "How to get all session beans from JBoss server"

by Thomas Bartsch

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "How to get all session beans from JBoss server": http://community.jboss.org/message/525022#525022 Author : Thomas Bartsch Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/tbar0711 Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, I'm using JBoss 4.2.3. At the moment I'm programming a short application. This application should locate all session beans in an deployed ear-file. Then I should be able to make a reflection to each session bean and find out which annotations it implements. Currently I have the problem that I don't know how to get all the beans as classes without knowing the name of the beans. Perhaps it is possible to get all beans as classes to be able to make reflections and identify the session beans by analyzing their annotations? Hope anybody can help. Regards Tom -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/525022#525022

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Tomcat Integration Development] New message: "Re: Deployment of on-demand web applications"

by jaikiran pai

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Deployment of on-demand web applications": http://community.jboss.org/message/524979#524979 Author : jaikiran pai Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jaikiran Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > mailto:bstansberry@jboss.com wrote: > > http://community.jboss.org/thread/147220 > > AS trunk currently has admin-console, jmx-console and jbossws-console starting this way. For now I left the http-invoker alone, as it's a bit of a different beast from a console. > And now my "default" server starts in 22 seconds (down from yesterday's 49 seconds) 13:51:22,550 INFO [org.jboss.bootstrap.impl.base.server.AbstractServer] JBossAS [6.0.0.SNAPSHOT (build: SVNTag=JBoss_6.0.0-SNAPSHOT date=r100736)] Started in 22s:374ms -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/524979#524979

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM Development] New message: "Re: No public metadata API?"

by Sebastian Schneider

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "No public metadata API?": http://community.jboss.org/message/524950#524950 Author : Sebastian Schneider Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/sebastian.s Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Why the heck is the wiki markup syntax not working? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/524950#524950

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2010