March 2010 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Tools Development] New message: "Re: Content Assist in attributes which should be filled with id's"

by Denis Golovin

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Content Assist in attributes which should be filled with id's": http://community.jboss.org/message/530242#530242 Author : Denis Golovin Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dgolovin Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I'm just brainstorming what would it be: 1. Enabling/disabling facelets on Dynamic Web Project which would modify required resources and add required libraries; 2. New wizards to create templates with selection from predefined layouts like: header/body, header/body/footer, header/left/body/footer and etc... 3. Template/component extraction (this one I heard from Alexander Smirnov) - select region/node in current jsp and then convert it into facelet component/template. Vice versa case also could be useful but it is not a priority. 4. Search for facelets elements references 5. Refactoring (is based on 4): - renaming/moving template files - renaming facelet elements like ui:insert@name value 6. Content assist improvements (see Maxim example) 7. Content assist Templates (see XML templates for XML editor or ant build.xml editor) 8. .... list is still open you name it -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530242#530242

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal Development] New message: "Re: Problem with Eclipse IDE and Maven"

by Juan Carlos Hipolito CastaÃ±eda

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Problem with Eclipse IDE and Maven": http://community.jboss.org/message/530224#530224 Author : Juan Carlos Hipolito CastaÃ±eda Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/juank Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks 4 helping me. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530224#530224

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Re: Circular Dependencies and Semi-Resolve"

by Adrian Brock

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Circular Dependencies and Semi-Resolve": http://community.jboss.org/message/530213#530213 Author : Adrian Brock Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/adrian@jboss.org Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > mailto:adrian@jboss.org wrote: > > Circular dependencies will only work if the DependencyItem explicitly invokes semiResolve() So I've still got to change the classloading's RequirementsDependencyItem to do this. ;-) -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530213#530213

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Re: Circular Dependencies and Semi-Resolve"

by Adrian Brock

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Circular Dependencies and Semi-Resolve": http://community.jboss.org/message/530211#530211 Author : Adrian Brock Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/adrian@jboss.org Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > alesj wrote: > > Does this work out-of-the-box for multiple circular depending deployments (aka OSGi bundles, which is what we're aiming for)? > > How are service's invalid configs reported -- A on B in ctor, and vice-versa? > I guess they just don't ever get resolved -- failing at check complete? Look at the tests, e.g. testTransientComplicatedCircular(), or write a new one if you think its not handled. ;-) I don't think I've got full coverage on the tests since there's a lot of edge-cases with the backwards compability handling, but I've got all of the basics. Circular dependencies will only work if the DependencyItem explicitly invokes semiResolve() (or it has some other way of handling it). So it doesn't change anything for existing implementations. The checkComplete() should work fine. If the circular dependency can be resolved, its DependencyItem will be in the RESOLVED state, so it won't appear in the IncompleteDeploymentException (IDE). If its only in the SEMI_RESOLVED state, i.e. something is missing, it will appear in the IDE. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530211#530211

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools Development] New message: "Re: Content Assist in attributes which should be filled with id's"

by Maxim Areshkau

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Content Assist in attributes which should be filled with id's": http://community.jboss.org/message/530209#530209 Author : Maxim Areshkau Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/mareshkau Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- May be this one *https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-5921 ?* -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530209#530209

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Re: Circular Dependencies and Semi-Resolve"

by Ales Justin

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Circular Dependencies and Semi-Resolve": http://community.jboss.org/message/530206#530206 Author : Ales Justin Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/alesj Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Does this work out-of-the-box for multiple circular depending deployments (aka OSGi bundles, which is what we're aiming for)? How are service's invalid configs reported -- A on B in ctor, and vice-versa? I guess they just don't ever get resolved -- failing at check complete? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530206#530206

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss ESB Development] New message: "Re: Camel integration input requested"

by Edgar Silva

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Camel integration input requested": http://community.jboss.org/message/530204#530204 Author : Edgar Silva Email : edgarsilva(a)gmail.com Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/edgar.silva Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, you are right, this gateway is inside the services section: <services>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <service category="Custom" name="Listener" description="" invmScope="GLOBAL"> <listeners> <listener name="ApacheCamel" busidref="ApacheCamel" is-gateway="true"> <property name="gatewayClass" value="org.jboss.soa.esb.listeners.gateway.camel.ApacheCamelListener"></property> <property name="protocol-uri" value="irc:breakingwoods@irc.freenode.net/#esbtest"></property> <property name="destination-category" value="sample-apachecamelESBService"></property> <property name="destination-name" value="sample-apachecamelESBServiceListener"></property> </listener> </listeners> <actions mep="OneWay"> <action name="dump" class="org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.SystemPrintln">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<property name="printfull" value="false"></property>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</action> </actions> </service>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<service category="sample-apachecamelESBService" name="sample-apachecamelESBServiceListener" description="Service responsible for interact with Actions based in Project sample-apachecamel">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<listeners>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<jms-listener name="JMS-Gateway" busidref="sample-apachecamelGwChannel" maxThreads="1" is-gateway="true"></jms-listener>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<jms-listener name="JMS-ESBListener" busidref="sample-apachecamelEsbChannel" maxThreads="1"></jms-listener>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</listeners>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<actions mep="OneWay">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<action name="dump" class="org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.SystemPrintln">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<property name="printfull" value="true"></property>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</action>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</actions>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</service>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</services> Based on your tips, I will improve this gateway source at breakingwoods SVN now Thanks -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530204#530204

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Security Development] Document updated/added: "PicketBox Security Annotations"

by ANIL SALDHANA

JBoss development, The document "PicketBox Security Annotations", was updated Mar 5, 2010 by ANIL SALDHANA. To view the document, visit: http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-14926#cf Document: -------------------------------------------------------------- << http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-14744 h3. Project: http://jboss.org/picketbox Here we describe the various security annotations available as part of PicketBox. h2. h2. @Authentication Annotation Fully Qualified Name: org.jboss.security.annotation.Authentication It contains: * an array of @Module annotations. h2. h2. @Module Annotation Fully Qualified Name: org.jboss.security.annotation.Module It contains: * code : the FQN of the module (Eg: "org.jboss.security.auth.spi.UsersRolesLoginModule") * --------------------------------------------------------------

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Circular Dependencies and Semi-Resolve"

by Adrian Brock

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Circular Dependencies and Semi-Resolve": http://community.jboss.org/message/530202#530202 Author : Adrian Brock Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/adrian@jboss.org Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBKERNEL-109 I've committed a prototype for circular dependencies. This involved three main changes: 1) The ability to "semiResolve" a dependency which means that you know what you want to depend on, but it is not in the correct state yet. However, if the only thing that is stopping it moving to the correct state is a circular dependency (i.e. other things in the semi-resolved state) then it will upgraded to fully resolved. 2) Change AbstractDependencyItem to use an enum for the three different types of resolved states, resolved, semi-resolved and unresolved and track the different types in AbstractDependencyInfo for optimized processing of the different types. 3) A change in AbstractController to introduce an "uninstalling" set like the "installing" set, to avoid recursive when uninstalling contexts that have circular dependencies. Caveats: * I haven't looked at adding ON_DEMAND processing, although it should be simple to add? * The semi-resolved handling only looks at contexts in the previous state to what you require. If they are in any earlier state then they are unresovled until they progress to the previous state. This avoids having to do a complicated determination on whether there is a path to break the circular dependency, rather than just advancing all the related semi-resolved contexts to the next state. Its usage should be trivial: public MyDependencyItem extends AbstractDependencyItem { public boolean resolve(Controller) { // Determine the context we want to be semi-resolved on ControllerContext ctx = ...; if (ctx == null) return false; // Pass the handling to AbstractDependencyItem return semiResolve(ctx); } } -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530202#530202

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Re: Undemand processing is wrong"

by Adrian Brock

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Undemand processing is wrong": http://community.jboss.org/message/530201#530201 Author : Adrian Brock Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/adrian@jboss.org Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBKERNEL-108 -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530201#530201

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2010