I consider
http://wiki.jboss.org/auth/wiki/DevJNDIBinding to be authoritative on resulting
JNDI names. The policy is just another means to get these results. If we want to change or
expand these, that should be done first.
The only thing that differs from Glassfish is how we handle a bean with 1 home interface.
That's why we have the (unsupported) option to disable JBMETA-11 checking.
In future I want to go to a mapped name which can contain expressions:
@Stateless(mappedName="java:global/env/$s:optional(${appName}/)${moduleName}/${beanName}#${interface}")
Which we should be able to realize with another policy implementation and then it should
be EJB 3.1 compliant.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164384#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...