[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: ServiceMetaData has the most recent dependencies/attribu

This week I have rewritten the Security Deployer (or more precisely to split into deployers based on the type of metadata). It is ready and I am checking it in tomorrow. The classes look as follows: | public abstract class AbstractSecurityDeployer<T extends IdMetaData> | extends AbstractDeployer | { | public AbstractSecurityDeployer() | { | setStage(DeploymentStages.POST_CLASSLOADER); | ... | setOutput(ServiceMetaData.class); | ... | } | } | | public class EarSecurityDeployer extends AbstractSecurityDeployer<JBossAppMetaData> | { | } | | public class EjbSecurityDeployer | extends AbstractSecurityDeployer<JBossMetaData> | {} | | public class WarSecurityDeployer extends AbstractSecurityDeployer<JBossWebMetaData> | { } | An issue that exists for addDependencies/addAttributes api addition to ServiceMetaData is that the internal data structures are Lists (rather than Sets) and hence there can be duplication of dependencies. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4130920#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...