[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of POJO Server] - Re: ProfileService equiv to ServiceBindingManager

That's certainly cleaner, both in terms of implementation and in clarity for a user looking at the config file. As for handling mbeans, options in ascending order of effort are: 1) Continue to support the current mechanism where org.jboss.system.microcontainer.ConfigureAction calls into the binding manager. Clunky but supports existing end-user custom mbean services with no change on their end required. 2) Convert mbeans services with ports to pojos w/ @JMX. For our own services, a good thing to do anyway in most if not all cases. 3) Add support for value-factory to the JMX config. Not sure what that entails. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167596#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...