[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Action Processing Pipelines on Listeners/Pollers...

"estebanschifman" wrote : Shouldn't the element lie within the element | as in the example code ? We could thus have different listeners performing different sequence of actions. | | | | <EsbConfig command-queue-class="org.jboss.soa.esb.command.InMemoryCommandQueue" | | command-queue-name="test-queue" | | > | | | | <ListenerConfig | | listenerClass="org.jboss.soa.esb.util.MockPoller" | | actions="X12N837-to-HL7V3, Process-HL7V3-Claim, HL7V3-to-X12N837, Route-to-Claims" | | maxThreads="1" | | > | | | | <Actions> | | <!-- | | Under the new architecture I think these will be equivalent to "Contracts Definitions"? | | --> | | <Action name="X12N837-to-HL7V3" processor="Smooks" /> | | <Action name="Process-HL7V3-Claim" processor="ClaimsProcessor" /> | | <Action name="HL7V3-to-X12N837" processor="Smooks" /> | | <Action name="Route-to-Claims" processor="SocketRouter"> | | <property name="address" value="xxxxx" /> | | </Action> | | | | <ProcessorAliases> | | <!-- | | Under the new architecture I think these will be equivalent to "Services"? The alias "name" being like the Service URN. | | --> | | <Alias name="Smooks" class="org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.SmooksTransformActionProcessor" /> | | <Alias name="ClaimsProcessor" class="com.acme.health.ClaimsProcessor" /> | | <Alias name="JmsRouter" class="org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.JmsRouter" /> | | <Alias name="SocketRouter" class="org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.SocketRouter" /> | | </ProcessorAliases> | | </Actions> | | </ListenerConfig> | | | | </EsbConfig> View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3971056#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...