"trustin" wrote :
| I'm not following this. Could you explain a little bit further? Regarding 1a, I
thought what we need to do is to run two Remoting versions (2 and 3) which calls local
EJB3?
|
I didn't express myself well. I meant that for Remoting 2, calls on an EJB3 would go
to AOPRemotingInvocationHandler, and for Remoting 3, they would go to something new, an
"AOPRemotingRequestListener", maybe. Of course the EJB3 code itself would be
the same. But there would be two paths to the same EJB3.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167344#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...