[jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Remoting Development] New message: "Re: Remoting 3: "groupName" -> "instanceName"?"

JBoss development, A new message was posted in the thread "Remoting 3: "groupName" -> "instanceName"?": http://community.jboss.org/message/532302#532302 Author : Ron Sigal Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/ron.sigal@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- No objections.   So, service type and group (instance) name are analogous to interface and implementation, I guess, so the name could be derived from that analogy, as well.  But "instanceName" seems OK, too.   -Ron -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/532302#532302