"charles.crouch(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| Agreed. This mapping seems to be the biggest point for discussion currently. Lets see
if we can determine how to move forward in the JBAS5 meeting tomorrow.
|
| I want to try to stick to solving this problem for DataSources first and try to avoid
getting swept out into the sea of complexity. To continue the water metaphor, I think
we're just learning to paddle, so anywhere other than the shallow end (i.e. simple use
cases) is not going to be helpful right now.
Fundamentally the only diff between a DataSource and arbitrary ear should be the depth of
the ManagedObject graphs, and the number of views that are available. What I would like to
come up with in terms of the mapping is something simple, and yet sufficient to allow for
the various extremes we are talking about. I have a view of what the mapping data might
look like that I'm working to flesh out for discussion. I'll try to get this out
tonight.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995758#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...