Mark Little [
http://community.jboss.org/people/marklittle] created the discussion
"Re: Remoting Transport Transaction Inflow Design Discussion"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/627622#627622
--------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Jenkinson wrote:
Jason, are we certain this is a feature that needs to be in EAP6 vs EAP6.1? I guess more
generally can you clarify your preferred and maximum timescales you would like us to
deliver this functionality within.
I've mentioned this before, but the
overriding issue here is that we will deliver EAP 6 on schedule. If the use cases we need
to have in EAP 6 from TS cannot be done by the ideal solution then we probably have no
option but to have a stop-gap implementation. We've discussed that on this forum
before and elsewhere so I think everyone understands what that would be. On the other
hand, if we can skip EAP 6 and go straight to EAP 6.1 and cover the use cases with the
ideal solution as outlined, then that gives us the better implementation, more time to
bake in the community, more time to QA etc.
Another point that was raised earlier (or rather a detail of the one
surrounding QA) is the question of testing this with remoting itself. Clearly some work
will be done on the remoting side to chat with the API we expose so is it realistic to
expect this level of testing to be performed in the timescale needed?
Yes, testing this is critical. We've seen over the past 20 years that testing the
recovery scenarios always take more time than anything else and for good reasons. So we
shouldn't underestimate how long this testing will take.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/627622#627622]
Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]