Carlo is complaining about how we match which constructor to use:
-
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-380
Thinking about it, what is really the reason we don't do better
- more exact matching - in InstantiateAction?
As constructor parameter dependencies should already be resolved,
we could eventually pre-invoke that ValueMetaData's to get real parameter values,
and do matching based on that?
Same with other parametrized metadata - property, lifecycle, installs, ...
I'm probably missing something obvious. :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187376#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...