[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Interruption and the Remoting 3 API

"david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : Some operations in Remoting 3 might be | So here's the question: should these normally-quick-but-possibly-sometimes-slow methods: | a) throw InterruptedException, | b) translate the InterruptedException into a RemotingException (and keep the thread's interruption status set), | or c) just run uninterruptably (and propagate the thread's interruption status)? | IMO I like option A for everything that is obviously I/O, and option B for anything very high-level, but using a subclassed exception in case someone wants to handle it still. -Jason View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4085741#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...