"pgier" wrote : Does the tree work ok without the "includes"
parameter? That's really weird behaviour and looks like a bug. Something in the
dependency resolution must have changed in 2.0.9 that messed up the dependency plugin.
You mean does "dependency:tree" work without "includes"? Sure.
I don't think I've found enough Context to provide Maven with a useful bug report.
Either way, this isn't the behaviour (intended or bug) that I'd expect from a
point release.
S,
ALR
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4154436#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...