[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Naming, @JNDI and OnDemand

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | We need a standard annotation that is provided independent of the implementation. | AS integration project is here: | http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/integration/ | as previously discussed on the dev list it is supposed to allow users to not have to | worry about the implemementations of how it is actually implemented. | e.g. in maven you import org.jboss.integration:naming not jnpserver or aop.argely untested, but you were in a hurry for me to commit it. :-) | Sure, the only problem I see is that we can end up with 1M sub-projects containing a single @annotation. Perhaps some common integration annotations should be under the same sub-project. e.g. org.jboss.integration:api or org.jboss.integration:annotations View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230483#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...