Yes, it makes sense for me., it seems a good solution for cluster environment where all
real server is accessible directly. In our environment (and I think is a widely used
solution) we have a load balancer router in front of our real server. Clients call virtual
address/port and Linux Virtual Server NAT the tcp connection to the less used real server.
I think in this situation isn't possible to use your ws-Addressing proposed solution
because real server can't be reached directly by client's http connection.
What I was proposing is a distributed multiple SubscriptionManager and EventDispatcher
synchronizing with jGroups. What's wrong in this solution?
I hope I was sufficient clear, let me know if my mind seems a farm pond full of frogs :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989697#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...