NO! :-)
What I told Carlo is to do what is done in the system-jmx xml parsing.
e.g. when you "parse" the @Dependency or where-ever else
you are creating dependencies that might be JMX or POJO.
i.e.
| String iDepend = ...
|
| Object other = iDependOn;
| try
| {
| other = new ObjectName(iDependOn).getCanonicalName();
| }
| catch (MalformedObjectNameException ignored)
| {
| // Not a JMX object name
| }
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032320#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...