[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: R3 transports to implement

"ron.sigal(a)jboss.com" wrote : "trustin" wrote : | | The socket and bisocket transport will run on XNIO / Netty. It's to make sure that R2 clients can talk to R3 services. It doesn't mean we are going to retain the old socket I/O code. | | | | Correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that, for a moderate number of worker threads, the old style blocking model outperforms NIO. If so, I would argue that, not only does it make sense to implement a new version of the socket transport, but it also makes sense to preserve the old version as well. I thought XNIO provides a blocking transport? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167266#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...