so,
if this behavior is allowed (deploying a war file with the same name as an existing war
file),
would it be legal/functionally alright to create their corresponding service id based on
their web context as opposed to the name of the war file?
web context seems to be one of the ways to uniquely identify these artifacts.
Is there any other simpler suggestion to create a unique service id?
I am assuming based on the test code that this behavior is allowed. If not, the bug is in
the test code and is a much simpler fix
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4126916#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...