[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: (O/T) JobExecutor enhencement proposition to allow 3rd f

Hi, "kukeltje" wrote : What I (personally) want to prevent is re-inventing the at least a complex wheel with the jobscheduler instead of using/extending jms just because some people do not want to use an appserver. | | I'm not against spring, but I've seen implementations of systems much more complex/wired just to prevent using MDB's. Here's just another vote for improved spring integration. Generally I agree with your comment, but the current application I'm working on is a dedicated background application that doesn't need the overhead of an appserver so we are using jBPM in a standalone environment. This is one of the reasons we picked jBPM because of the stated goal of being lightweight and able to run in a standalone / embedded environment w/o requiring an appserver. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4091749#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...