"julien(a)jboss.com" wrote : one glitch I noticed is that in the explicit case, if
a parameter is not explicit declared in a binding then it will simply never retain its
state.
|
| It is visible in the explicit sample if you update PublicParametersPortletWindow1 juu1
parameter. The value is lost.
|
| I think it should rather remain private rather than being discarded, which would mean
that in the explicit case this parameter is considered like a private parameters and is
stored in the per window navigational state. Which would mean to add a Map<String,
String[]> in the WindowNavigationalState to store such state.
|
| What do you think ?
I remember we discussed it some time ago a bit. The thing is what behaviour would be
expected. This would be the difference between FALLBACK and EXPLICIT strategy. In EXPLICIT
param not wired is lost while in FALLBACK not.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4166083#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...